Bug#430184: [Pkg-xfce-devel] Bug#430184: Bug#430184: xfce4-utils: prevent window resize on startup

2007-09-09 Thread Michael Gilbert
what did upstream think of this? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#430184: xfce4-utils: prevent window resize on startup

2007-06-23 Thread Michael Gilbert
Subject: xfce4-utils: prevent window resize on startup Package: xfce4-utils Version: 4.4.1-1 Severity: minor Tags: patch the following patch to xfce4-help/info.c sizes the help window to the maximum horizontal width that fits all of the text boxes (590 pixels). this is currently done with -1

Bug#430184: [Pkg-xfce-devel] Bug#430184: xfce4-utils: prevent window resize on startup

2007-06-23 Thread Yves-Alexis Perez
On sam, 2007-06-23 at 02:13 -0400, Michael Gilbert wrote: the following patch to xfce4-help/info.c sizes the help window to the maximum horizontal width that fits all of the text boxes (590 pixels). I guess you're speaking of xfce4-about? this is currently done with -1 (automatic), and the

Bug#430184: [Pkg-xfce-devel] Bug#430184: xfce4-utils: prevent window resize on startup

2007-06-23 Thread Michael Gilbert
i should add that using -1 doesn't size the window wide enough to show the full length of the BSDL and GPL text. the last few characters on the right get cut off. mike -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#430184: [Pkg-xfce-devel] Bug#430184: xfce4-utils: prevent window resize on startup

2007-06-23 Thread Michael Gilbert
On 6/23/07, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote: On sam, 2007-06-23 at 02:13 -0400, Michael Gilbert wrote: the following patch to xfce4-help/info.c sizes the help window to the maximum horizontal width that fits all of the text boxes (590 pixels). I guess you're speaking of xfce4-about? oops. yes,

Bug#430184: [Pkg-xfce-devel] Bug#430184: Bug#430184: xfce4-utils: prevent window resize on startup

2007-06-23 Thread Yves-Alexis Perez
On sam, 2007-06-23 at 12:09 -0400, Michael Gilbert wrote: I don't really think this is really a problem either. Instead, I'd say -1 is the good thing, so there is no change to do in the code if there's more thing to add. i am using a slower computer (1.6 ghz), and the effect is pretty