(as discussed on IRC and for the benefit of the bug log)
Hi,
Mark Brown wrote:
Package: devscripts
Version: 2.10.5
Severity: important
Attemptting to run tagpending on the changelog for zlib with the
following entry at the head:
[...]
results in tagpending claiming that there is nothing to
On Thu, Jun 28, 2007 at 10:20:47AM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
verbose mode isn't exactly ideal (particularly the already tagged pending
message, which really means probably shouldn't be tagged pending any more
as it's open, tagged pending but not closed in the current changelog - did
Mark Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote, Thursday, June 28, 2007 12:43 PM
It would be useful to output something for all bugs listed in the
changelog - my experience was that the wording of the message
was less important than the fact that there was no visible indication
that the program was paying
On Thu, Jun 28, 2007 at 02:15:49PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
Using the new version against the changelog you supplied, I get:
That's a lot clearer, thanks.
--
You grabbed my hand and we fell into it, like a daydream - or a fever.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Package: devscripts
Version: 2.10.5
Severity: important
Attemptting to run tagpending on the changelog for zlib with the
following entry at the head:
| zlib (1:1.2.3.3.dfsg-3) unstable; urgency=low
|
| * Support building with UNALIGNED_OK and enable it on i386 and amd64.
| This seems to
5 matches
Mail list logo
