Bug#433133: ASYNCMOUNTNFS=no

2007-07-19 Thread Steinar H. Gunderson
On Thu, Jul 19, 2007 at 03:58:58AM -0600, Bruce Sass wrote: > First thing I tried (with the -10 build, both by adding it to the > options list in fstab and "mount -o..."), mount complained that nolocks > was unsupported by(for?) nfs. Hm, that's interesting. I'll check it out at some point. > I'

Bug#433133: ASYNCMOUNTNFS=no

2007-07-19 Thread Bruce Sass
On Thu July 19 2007 03:01:30 am you wrote: > > I can manually start rpc.statd, then mount the missing nfs imports, > > but since /usr was missing during the boot there is bound to be > > stuff which didn't start properly. Is there a way to ensure > > everything is in order besides manually discover

Bug#433133: ASYNCMOUNTNFS=no

2007-07-19 Thread Steinar H. Gunderson
On Wed, Jul 18, 2007 at 05:28:42PM -0600, Bruce Sass wrote: > This doesn't work for me, it kinda makes things worse because now the > messages telling me that statd isn't running disappear off the screen > before I can read them. OK, thanks. > I can manually start rpc.statd, then mount the miss

Bug#433133: ASYNCMOUNTNFS=no

2007-07-18 Thread Bruce Sass
> Try setting ASYNCMOUNTNFS=no in /etc/default/rcS. I'm currently > talking to the initscripts maintainers to try to find a good solution; > it seems like the fix in 1:1.1.0-10 introduced a race condition. This doesn't work for me, it kinda makes things worse because now the messages telling m