On Thu, Jul 19, 2007 at 03:58:58AM -0600, Bruce Sass wrote:
> First thing I tried (with the -10 build, both by adding it to the
> options list in fstab and "mount -o..."), mount complained that nolocks
> was unsupported by(for?) nfs.
Hm, that's interesting. I'll check it out at some point.
> I'
On Thu July 19 2007 03:01:30 am you wrote:
> > I can manually start rpc.statd, then mount the missing nfs imports,
> > but since /usr was missing during the boot there is bound to be
> > stuff which didn't start properly. Is there a way to ensure
> > everything is in order besides manually discover
On Wed, Jul 18, 2007 at 05:28:42PM -0600, Bruce Sass wrote:
> This doesn't work for me, it kinda makes things worse because now the
> messages telling me that statd isn't running disappear off the screen
> before I can read them.
OK, thanks.
> I can manually start rpc.statd, then mount the miss
> Try setting ASYNCMOUNTNFS=no in /etc/default/rcS. I'm currently
> talking to the initscripts maintainers to try to find a good solution;
> it seems like the fix in 1:1.1.0-10 introduced a race condition.
This doesn't work for me, it kinda makes things worse because now the
messages telling m
4 matches
Mail list logo