On Wed, 18 Jul 2007, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> > $ dpkg -S /usr/bin/editor
> > non-packaged symlink to /etc/alternatives/editor: /usr/bin/editor
> > non-packaged symlink to /usr/bin/vim: /etc/alternatives/editor
> > non-packaged symlink to /etc/alternatives/vim: /usr/bin/vim
> > non-packaged symlink
tag 433290 + patch
thanks
On Mon, 16 Jul 2007, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> For symlinks we could have:
> $ dpkg -S /usr/bin/man
> non-packaged symlink to /usr/lib/man-db/man: /usr/bin/man
> man-db: /usr/lib/man-db/man
>
> It should do symlink resolution one by one. Which means that for
> alternative
forcemerge 198220 433290
thanks
On Mon, 16 Jul 2007, Bruce Sass wrote:
> This is a known wishlist item and should either be closed or merged with
> bug #198220 (http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=198220)
Agreed and merged. My personal opinion is that dpkg -S should follow
symlinks
On Mon July 16 2007 01:05:01 am [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> why not found package man?
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/etc# dpkg -S /usr/bin/man
> dpkg: /usr/bin/man not found.
Because /usr/bin/man is a symlink and doesn't exist as a file in any
package. "dpkg -S" searches through the contents of
the /va
Package: dpkg
Version: 1.13.25 (i386).
why not found package man?
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/etc# dpkg -S /usr/bin/man
dpkg: /usr/bin/man not found.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/var/log# uname -a
Linux bridge 2.6.18-4-686 #1 SMP Wed May 9 23:03:12 UTC 2007 i686 GNU/Linux
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/etc# cat /etc/debian
5 matches
Mail list logo
