On Mon, Mar 17, 2008 at 09:48:40PM +0200, Eddy Petrișor wrote:
>>> Lars Lindner wrote:
>> Nonetheless I identified the problem. You do massively mark posts
>> as important (flagged). Which is not forbidden, but was totally
>> unexpected by me when I implemented the merging algorithm.
>
> Heh :-) .
On Mon, Mar 17, 2008 at 7:53 PM, Eddy Petrișor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Lars Lindner wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 17, 2008 at 4:33 PM, Luis Rodrigo Gallardo Cruz
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> On Mon, Mar 17, 2008 at 02:21:14PM +0200, Eddy Petrișor wrote:
> >> > Luis Rodrigo Gallardo Cruz
On Mon, Mar 17, 2008 at 9:37 PM, Eddy Petrișor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Luis Rodrigo Gallardo Cruz wrote:
>
>
> > On Mon, Mar 17, 2008 at 09:48:40PM +0200, Eddy Petrișor wrote:
> Lars Lindner wrote:
> >>> Nonetheless I identified the problem. You do massively mark posts
> >>> as importa
On Mon, Mar 17, 2008 at 4:33 PM, Luis Rodrigo Gallardo Cruz
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 17, 2008 at 02:21:14PM +0200, Eddy Petrișor wrote:
> > Luis Rodrigo Gallardo Cruz wrote:
> >> On Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 02:33:54AM +0200, Eddy Petrișor wrote:
>
> On to more promising lands:
>
On Mon, Mar 17, 2008 at 02:21:14PM +0200, Eddy Petrișor wrote:
> Luis Rodrigo Gallardo Cruz wrote:
>> On Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 02:33:54AM +0200, Eddy Petrișor wrote:
On to more promising lands:
Could you try running with --debug-update, please?
>>> I moved away the ~/.liferea_1.4 dire
Lars Lindner wrote:
On Mon, Mar 17, 2008 at 9:37 PM, Eddy Petrișor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Luis Rodrigo Gallardo Cruz wrote:
> If this works for you, please let me know. I'll then downgrade this
> report's severity but leave it open as a hint for others.
Yes, it does, but why hide/bury it
Luis Rodrigo Gallardo Cruz wrote:
On Mon, Mar 17, 2008 at 09:48:40PM +0200, Eddy Petrișor wrote:
Lars Lindner wrote:
Nonetheless I identified the problem. You do massively mark posts
as important (flagged). Which is not forbidden, but was totally
unexpected by me when I implemented the merging
Lars Lindner wrote:
On Mon, Mar 17, 2008 at 7:53 PM, Eddy Petrișor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Lars Lindner wrote:
> To be honest your error report is pretty vague and one cannot really
> determine what you problem is. You really need to provide more details!
> For example I'm not sure you tol
On 17/03/2008, Luis Rodrigo Gallardo Cruz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 17, 2008 at 02:21:14PM +0200, Eddy Petrișor wrote:
> > Luis Rodrigo Gallardo Cruz wrote:
> >> On Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 02:33:54AM +0200, Eddy Petrișor wrote:
>
> On to more promising lands:
>
> Coul
Luis Rodrigo Gallardo Cruz wrote:
On Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 02:33:54AM +0200, Eddy Petrișor wrote:
Luis Rodrigo Gallardo Cruz wrote:
And the migration of *that* is done by a simple copying over of the
file to the new .liferea_1.4 dir. Which pretty much rules out an error
there. Still, just to mak
On Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 02:33:54AM +0200, Eddy Petrișor wrote:
> Luis Rodrigo Gallardo Cruz wrote:
>>
>> And the migration of *that* is done by a simple copying over of the
>> file to the new .liferea_1.4 dir. Which pretty much rules out an error
>> there. Still, just to make sure, please take a lo
Luis Rodrigo Gallardo Cruz wrote:
On Wed, Mar 12, 2008 at 12:34:47AM +0200, Eddy Petrișor wrote:
On 11/03/2008, Luis Rodrigo Gallardo Cruz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Tue, Mar 11, 2008 at 01:07:04AM +0200, Eddy Petrișor wrote:
> Luis Rodrigo Gallardo Cruz wrote:
Otherwise, please check the
On Wed, Mar 12, 2008 at 12:34:47AM +0200, Eddy Petrișor wrote:
> On 11/03/2008, Luis Rodrigo Gallardo Cruz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 11, 2008 at 01:07:04AM +0200, Eddy Petrișor wrote:
> > > Luis Rodrigo Gallardo Cruz wrote:
> >
> > >> Otherwise, please check the feed properties to
On 11/03/2008, Luis Rodrigo Gallardo Cruz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 11, 2008 at 01:07:04AM +0200, Eddy Petrișor wrote:
> > Luis Rodrigo Gallardo Cruz wrote:
>
> >> Otherwise, please check the feed properties to see if the update
> >> intervals were imported correctly. Check also th
On Tue, Mar 11, 2008 at 01:07:04AM +0200, Eddy Petrișor wrote:
> Luis Rodrigo Gallardo Cruz wrote:
>> Otherwise, please check the feed properties to see if the update
>> intervals were imported correctly. Check also the default interval set
>> in preferences.
>
> I don't care about each feed's upda
retitle 433393 liferea doesn't update some feeds after migration to new format
thanks
Eddy Petrișor wrote:
Luis Rodrigo Gallardo Cruz wrote:
On Fri, Mar 07, 2008 at 08:05:45PM +0200, Eddy Petrișor wrote:
Since liferea I updated to this version and liferea updated its
database to the new form
Luis Rodrigo Gallardo Cruz wrote:
On Fri, Mar 07, 2008 at 08:05:45PM +0200, Eddy Petrișor wrote:
Since liferea I updated to this version and liferea updated its database
to the new format, none of the feeds are updated anymore.
For instance, Planet Debian has the tip stuck on
http://ressukka.
On Fri, Mar 07, 2008 at 08:05:45PM +0200, Eddy Petrișor wrote:
> Since liferea I updated to this version and liferea updated its database
> to the new format, none of the feeds are updated anymore.
>
> For instance, Planet Debian has the tip stuck on
> http://ressukka.net/blog/posts/20070517_debi
Package: liferea
Version: 1.4.12-1
Justification: doesn't do its basic functionality
# I hope this works
severity 433393 serious
thanks
--- Please enter the report below this line. ---
Since liferea I updated to this version and liferea updated its database
to the new format, none of the feeds
19 matches
Mail list logo
