Bug#434962: International date format is not ISO 8601 compliant.

2008-07-06 Thread Trent W. Buck
On Wed, Jan 02, 2008 at 11:19:42PM +0100, Toni Mueller wrote: I'll talk to upstream about it, but personally think that while you are formally correct, legibility is actually increased by using a dot. Today I ran into a specific use case where the current behaviour is clearly detrimental. To

Bug#434962: International date format is not ISO 8601 compliant.

2008-04-01 Thread Toni Mueller
Hello Trent, On Sat, 28.07.2007 at 10:42:00 +1000, Trent W. Buck [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The _User Guide_ document states that | Date-and-time stamps are specified with the date in international | standard format (-mm-dd) joined to the time (hh:mm:ss) by a | period .. AFAICT this is

Bug#434962: International date format is not ISO 8601 compliant.

2008-01-02 Thread Toni Mueller
Hi, I'll talk to upstream about it, but personally think that while you are formally correct, legibility is actually increased by using a dot. That notwithstanding, either the documentation or the program should be changed to remove the invalidity of the claim. Best, --Toni++ -- To

Bug#434962: International date format is not ISO 8601 compliant.

2007-07-27 Thread Trent W. Buck
Package: roundup Version: 1.3.3-3 Severity: wishlist The _User Guide_ document states that | Date-and-time stamps are specified with the date in international | standard format (-mm-dd) joined to the time (hh:mm:ss) by a | period .. AFAICT this is *not* the international standard format;