On 8/11/07, Ove Kaaven <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Anyway, I don't see the "defaults" option listed in your fstab line.
> It's quite possible that "exec" (one of the options enabled by
> "defaults") is needed, and maybe it's enabled by default when you did
> the manual mount without options, but
lør, 11.08.2007 kl. 19.32 +0530, skrev Naresh Venkateshappa:
> > Shouldn't you use noauto if you're manually mounting?
>
> I didn't want to manually mount (/dev/hda9 - the partition that holds
> the iso), that's why I added an fstab entry
>
> > And shouldn't an ISO image have iso9660 as filesyste
Oops. Mistake:
> I uncommented the fstab entry and started off again as I did in the
should be "commented out"
> beginning and it's fine now.
--
Naresh V
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTE
On 8/11/07, Ove Kaaven <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Naresh Venkateshappa wrote:
> > Now, I added an fstab entry
> >
> > "#/dev/hda9 /media/hda9 reiserfs notail,noatime,user,auto 0 0"
>
> Just a few thoughts:
>
> Did the fstab line actually have that hash sign?
No, there was no hash s
Naresh Venkateshappa wrote:
Now, I added an fstab entry
"#/dev/hda9 /media/hda9 reiserfs notail,noatime,user,auto 0 0"
Just a few thoughts:
Did the fstab line actually have that hash sign?
Shouldn't you use noauto if you're manually mounting?
And shouldn't an ISO image have iso9
Package: wine
Architecture: amd64
Version: 0.9.37-1
I have a reiserfs partition that belongs to gentoo which holds my BroodWar.iso
I recently installed debian (unstable) and manually did (as root)
step 1: `mount /dev/hda9 /media/hda9`
step 2: `mount
/media/hda9/home/nareshov/Desktop/Downloads/S
6 matches
Mail list logo
