Package: logcheck-database
Version: 1.2.54
Severity: normal
violations.ignore.d/logcheck-postfix includes the following rule:
^\w{3} [ :[:digit:]]{11} [._[:alnum:]-]+ postfix/smtpd\[[[:digit:]]+\]:
warning: [-._[:alnum:]]+\[[.[:digit:]]+\]: SASL
(LOGIN|PLAIN|(DIGEST|CRAM)-MD5|APOP) authentication failed:?$
The trailing ":?$" appears to be in error, as the ":" would imply some
additional text that would not be matched. (Indeed, all such warnings
are "authentication failed: authentication failure" in my case. And no,
I don't know who came up with that wording. <g>)
I would think that "(:.*)?$" would be more useful, or, if we put on our
paranoid hats, "(: authentication failure)?$".
-- System Information:
Debian Release: lenny/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.21-2-k7 (SMP w/1 CPU core)
Locale: LANG=en_CA.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_CA.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
