Hi Samuel,
On Sam, 01 Sep 2007, Samuel Thibault wrote:
Well, either should work fine for hurd-i386 because it happens that
Ok, for now I leave your patch in there. We will see what upstream will
do, and what will be included by Jonathan into the xetex sources.
Thanks a lot.
Norbert
On Die, 28 Aug 2007, Michael Casadevall wrote:
Independently of Samuel, I ended up patching the same bug in Texlive,
but I did a different method of fixing
On Mit, 29 Aug 2007, Samuel Thibault wrote:
That should rather be sizeof(FILE*): rgfp is an array of FILE*, not an
array of FILE.
Hi,
Norbert Preining, le Fri 31 Aug 2007 20:47:50 +0200, a écrit :
On Die, 28 Aug 2007, Michael Casadevall wrote:
Independently of Samuel, I ended up patching the same bug in Texlive,
but I did a different method of fixing
On Mit, 29 Aug 2007, Samuel Thibault wrote:
That should rather
Hi,
Michael Casadevall, le Tue 28 Aug 2007 01:17:10 -0400, a écrit :
+#ifdef NOFILE
FILE*rgfp[NOFILE+1];/* stack of input/include files */
+#else
+FILE **rgfp;
+#endif /* NOFILE */
+
intcfp = 0;/* count of files in stack */
intcOpenBrace = 0;
Independently of Samuel, I ended up patching the same bug in Texlive,
but I did a different method of fixing
NOFILE instead of simply defining it to 256; According to the POSIX
reference I found, NOFILE is the maximum
files that can be opened at one time by a single process. On hurd, this
is
Hi Samuel,
first, thanks a lot. BTW, is this the first version that does not build?
Or have prior version been build without problems? That would be
strange, since we haven't changed anything in recent times.
On Mit, 15 Aug 2007, Samuel Thibault wrote:
texlive-bin currently FTBFS on hurd-i386
Hi, again me ...
On Mit, 15 Aug 2007, Samuel Thibault wrote:
--- texlive-bin-2007/build/source/Work/texk/detex/xxx.l.orig 2007-08-14
22:44:53.229859000 +0200
+++ texlive-bin-2007/build/source/Work/texk/detex/xxx.l 2007-08-14
22:45:19.329634000 +0200
@@ -59,6 +59,10 @@
#endif
Hi,
Norbert Preining, le Thu 16 Aug 2007 11:11:55 +0200, a écrit :
first, thanks a lot. BTW, is this the first version that does not build?
It actually never built on hurd-i386.
On Mit, 15 Aug 2007, Samuel Thibault wrote:
texlive-bin currently FTBFS on hurd-i386 because of the copy of icu
On Don, 16 Aug 2007, Samuel Thibault wrote:
It actually never built on hurd-i386.
Ok.
Well, I have to admit no, because the patch can't hurt other archs in
any way: the aclocal.m4/configure *-*-gnu*) match can only happen on
hurd-i386, and #defining NOFILE after all #includes cannot hurt in
Hi,
Norbert Preining, le Thu 16 Aug 2007 11:41:50 +0200, a écrit :
Well, I have to admit no, because the patch can't hurt other archs in
any way: the aclocal.m4/configure *-*-gnu*) match can only happen on
hurd-i386, and #defining NOFILE after all #includes cannot hurt in any
way.
Package: texlive-bin
Version: 2007-13
Severity: important
Tags: patch
Hi,
texlive-bin currently FTBFS on hurd-i386 because of the copy of icu that
it embeds. Here is the patch that already got applied to the icu package
and is being forwarded icu upstream.
There was also a problem with xxx.l
11 matches
Mail list logo
