tags 438106 + patch pending
thanks
On 20/08/07 at 01:04 +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
On Sun, Aug 19, 2007 at 06:59:25PM -0400, Daniel Schepler wrote:
Instead of using -Navifile-win32-plugin to fix the FTBFS on non-i386 archs,
why not use -s instead? With that you won't need the special
Instead of using -Navifile-win32-plugin to fix the FTBFS on non-i386 archs,
why not use -s instead? With that you won't need the special section to
handle avifile-win32-plugin explicitly on i386.
--
Daniel Schepler
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe.
On Sun, Aug 19, 2007 at 06:59:25PM -0400, Daniel Schepler wrote:
Instead of using -Navifile-win32-plugin to fix the FTBFS on non-i386 archs,
why not use -s instead? With that you won't need the special section to
handle avifile-win32-plugin explicitly on i386.
I didn't know about -s yet,
Package: avifile
Version: 1:0.7.47.20070718-1.1
Severity: serious
Hi,
Your package is failing to build on amd64 with the following error:
dh_gencontrol
dpkg-gencontrol: error: current build architecture amd64 does not appear in
package's list (i386 kfreebsd-i386)
dh_gencontrol: command returned
Hi
How about some patch ?
Would it be possible to help me with this ?
thnx
kabi
2007/8/15, Kurt Roeckx [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Package: avifile
Version: 1:0.7.47.20070718-1.1
Severity: serious
Hi,
Your package is failing to build on amd64 with the following error:
dh_gencontrol
On Wed, Aug 15, 2007 at 03:30:01PM +0200, Zdenek Kabelac wrote:
Hi
How about some patch ?
Would it be possible to help me with this ?
You need to avoid doing anything with the avifile-win32-plugin
package on amd64.
I've attached a patch that seems to work for me.
Kurt
--- rules.old
6 matches
Mail list logo
