Bug#438144: Info received (Bug#438144: linux-image-2.6.21-2-686: new kernel does not like my ATI Rage 128 card)

2008-11-28 Thread Moritz Muehlenhoff
On Sun, Oct 14, 2007 at 10:01:20PM -0700, Itai Seggev wrote: I've now tried it with both the linux-image-2.6.23-rc5-2-686 package in experimental, as well as a self-made kernel compiled from linux-source-2.6.22 in lenny/sid. This self compiled kernel works fine, but the linux-image kernel

Bug#438144: Info received (Bug#438144: linux-image-2.6.21-2-686: new kernel does not like my ATI Rage 128 card)

2007-10-14 Thread Itai Seggev
I've now tried it with both the linux-image-2.6.23-rc5-2-686 package in experimental, as well as a self-made kernel compiled from linux-source-2.6.22 in lenny/sid. This self compiled kernel works fine, but the linux-image kernel doesn't work. So perhaps this is some kernel configuration problem?

Bug#438144: linux-image-2.6.21-2-686: new kernel does not like my ATI Rage 128 card

2007-10-11 Thread Itai Seggev
I have tested the kernel again with the new kernel which entered lenny this week. The problem still persists. Xorg.log is below. If I have the chance, I will try a kernel from experimental. X Window System Version 1.3.0 Release Date: 19 April 2007 X Protocol Version 11, Revision 0, Release 1.3

Bug#438144: linux-image-2.6.21-2-686: new kernel does not like my ATI Rage 128 card

2007-08-15 Thread Itai Seggev
Package: linux-image-2.6.21-2-686 Version: 2.6.21-6 Severity: important I normally use a self-compiled kernel, but keep a debian kernel around. After booting into the 2.6.21-2-686 kernel, X wouldn't start (log file below). This problem does not occur with my self-compiled 2.6.21 kernel (from

Bug#438144: linux-image-2.6.21-2-686: new kernel does not like my ATI Rage 128 card

2007-08-15 Thread maximilian attems
tags 438144 moreinfo stop On Wed, Aug 15, 2007 at 11:11:48AM -0500, Itai Seggev wrote: I normally use a self-compiled kernel, but keep a debian kernel around. After booting into the 2.6.21-2-686 kernel, X wouldn't start (log file below). This problem does not occur with my self-compiled