Bug#438757: tcptraceroute: alternative needed due to traceroute update

2007-10-09 Thread Daniel Baumann
Hi, any progress on this? Regards, Daniel -- Address:Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Biberist Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Internet: http://people.panthera-systems.net/~daniel-baumann/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of

Bug#438757: tcptraceroute: alternative needed due to traceroute update

2007-10-09 Thread David Coe
Hi, Daniel I haven't had a chance yet to compare tcptraceroute's capabilities with the new one in the traceroute package; have you? If they're similar enough we probably don't need both. On 10/9/07, Daniel Baumann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, any progress on this? Regards, Daniel --

Bug#438757: tcptraceroute: alternative needed due to traceroute update

2007-10-09 Thread Daniel Baumann
David Coe wrote: I haven't had a chance yet to compare tcptraceroute's capabilities with the new one in the traceroute package; have you? If they're similar enough we probably don't need both. as of now (traceroute 2.0.9), the wrapper in traceroute for tcptraceroute is only for mapping

Bug#438757: tcptraceroute: alternative needed due to traceroute update

2007-10-09 Thread David Coe
Daniel, Thanks for the info; I will add the alternative support when I can; if you feel like doing an NMU for this, have at it. -David -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#438757: tcptraceroute: alternative needed due to traceroute update

2007-08-19 Thread Rémi Denis-Courmont
Package: tcptraceroute Version: 1.5beta6-2 Severity: important traceroute is providing a tcptraceroute binary, now using Debian alternatives. tcptraceroute needs to switch as well (or conflict with traceroute, but that does not look like a good idea). Regards, -- Rémi Denis-Courmont