Martin Michlmayr [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
* Martin Michlmayr [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-08-29 12:09]:
In order words,
INDEX 00 00:00:00
INDEX 01 00:00:32
is printed for the first track.
So I'd propose:
Thanks, Martin, and sorry for not responding earlier. This looks
good to
* Eric Gillespie [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-08-27 14:31]:
I suppose this patch should fix it? Not tested, but I think it
matches your original patch. I'm not sure why you removed the
first TRACK 01 AUDIO line, but neither am I sure why it's there.
I removed it but at the same time I decreased
* Martin Michlmayr [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-08-29 12:09]:
In order words,
INDEX 00 00:00:00
INDEX 01 00:00:32
is printed for the first track.
So I'd propose:
Index: fa-rip
===
--- fa-rip (revision 2155)
+++ fa-rip
Package: mkcue
Version: 1-2
Severity: important
As a comment in mkcue.cc says, mkcue assumes that the first song
always starts after 150 frames. However, this assumption is wrong.
As I understand it (from investigating this issue as it relates to
jack, see #319901), every CD has 150 frames that
Martin Michlmayr [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Package: mkcue
Version: 1-2
Severity: important
As a comment in mkcue.cc says, mkcue assumes that the first song
always starts after 150 frames. However, this assumption is wrong.
As you might guess from that comment, I'm no expert in this area,
* Eric Gillespie [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-08-27 13:57]:
As you might guess from that comment, I'm no expert in this area,
and am not surprised I got it wrong. I use libmusicbrainz to
make cue sheets now, and have abandoned mkcue. It's a dead
package, unless someone else wants to take it up.
Martin Michlmayr [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Out of interest, how does one use libmusicbrainz for cue sheets and
does it get it right? I looked at your flac-archive script, and while
it uses some libmusicbrainz libraries, the cue sheet generation is
quite similar to mkcue (and has the same
7 matches
Mail list logo
