Bug#440068: gnumach: GPT in fp_save, fpu.c:675

2007-09-11 Thread Michael Banck
On Tue, Sep 11, 2007 at 12:12:27AM -0400, Michael Casadevall wrote: Ever since applying this patch, mach panics for me on startup. It gets as far as starting sshd, then it panics with panic: zalloc: zone i386 pcb state exhausted kernel breakpoint trap, eip 0x1179d7 stopped at 0x1179d6: int

Bug#440068: gnumach: GPT in fp_save, fpu.c:675

2007-09-11 Thread Samuel Thibault
Oops, yes, sorry, please use the attached patch instead. Samuel Index: kern/zalloc.c === RCS file: /cvsroot/hurd/gnumach/kern/zalloc.c,v retrieving revision 1.3.2.8 diff -u -p -r1.3.2.8 zalloc.c --- kern/zalloc.c 30 Apr 2007

Bug#440068: gnumach: GPT in fp_save, fpu.c:675

2007-09-11 Thread pietro
On Tue, 11 Sep 2007 11:05:51 +0200, Samuel Thibault [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Oops, yes, sorry, please use the attached patch instead. i got gnumach package source, patched manually and rebuilt it. it worked on qemu with and without kqemu. pietro.

Bug#440068: gnumach: GPT in fp_save, fpu.c:675

2007-09-10 Thread Michael Casadevall
Ever since applying this patch, mach panics for me on startup. It gets as far as starting sshd, then it panics with panic: zalloc: zone i386 pcb state exhausted kernel breakpoint trap, eip 0x1179d7 stopped at 0x1179d6: int $3 Any ideas why I'm getting a panic while others aren't? (I haven't had

Bug#440068: gnumach: GPT in fp_save, fpu.c:675

2007-09-03 Thread Samuel Thibault
Hi, Samuel Thibault, le Wed 29 Aug 2007 16:50:20 +0200, a écrit : Michael Banck, le Wed 29 Aug 2007 16:13:20 +0200, a écrit : eax 0x107502f8 This is the culprit: fxsave needs the buffer to be 16 bytes-aligned. It looks like there is a bug somewhere in the alignment support of zalloc().

Bug#440068: gnumach: GPT in fp_save, fpu.c:675

2007-08-30 Thread Samuel Thibault
Hi, Thomas Schwinge, le Thu 30 Aug 2007 01:11:23 +0200, a écrit : Hello! On Wed, Aug 29, 2007 at 11:12:14PM +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote: Thomas Schwinge, le Wed 29 Aug 2007 22:44:06 +0200, a écrit : Why isn't that patch in upsteam cvs? Does it need more testing (as this bug report

Bug#440068: gnumach: GPT in fp_save, fpu.c:675

2007-08-29 Thread Michael Banck
package: gnumach version: 2:1.3.99.dfsg.cvs20070809-1 I caught this GPT twice now, so filing here: The error message was (something like): General Protection Trap (13) code=0 This is the trace: 0x100d60 fp_save /build/buildd/gnumach-1.3.99.dfsg.cvs20070809/build-dbg/../i386/i386/fpu.c:675

Bug#440068: gnumach: GPT in fp_save, fpu.c:675

2007-08-29 Thread Samuel Thibault
Hi, Michael Banck, le Wed 29 Aug 2007 16:13:20 +0200, a écrit : eax 0x107502f8 This is the culprit: fxsave needs the buffer to be 16 bytes-aligned. It looks like there is a bug somewhere in the alignment support of zalloc(). Samuel

Bug#440068: gnumach: GPT in fp_save, fpu.c:675

2007-08-29 Thread Thomas Schwinge
[Cced to [EMAIL PROTECTED] as it's a GNU Mach bug.] Hello! On Wed, Aug 29, 2007 at 04:50:20PM +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote: Michael Banck, le Wed 29 Aug 2007 16:13:20 +0200, a écrit : eax 0x107502f8 This is the culprit: fxsave needs the buffer to be 16 bytes-aligned. It fnsave, you mean,

Bug#440068: gnumach: GPT in fp_save, fpu.c:675

2007-08-29 Thread Samuel Thibault
Thomas Schwinge, le Wed 29 Aug 2007 21:39:36 +0200, a écrit : This is the culprit: fxsave needs the buffer to be 16 bytes-aligned. It fnsave, you mean, I guess. No, really fxsave (the MMX version). fnsave would be fine. looks like there is a bug somewhere in the alignment support of

Bug#440068: gnumach: GPT in fp_save, fpu.c:675

2007-08-29 Thread Samuel Thibault
Thomas Schwinge, le Wed 29 Aug 2007 22:44:06 +0200, a écrit : Why isn't that patch in upsteam cvs? Does it need more testing (as this bug report might indicate)? Well, the buildd tested it pretty well, and yes, this bug needs to be fixed. Then it should be ok to commit. The MMX support is not