Hello,
On Monday, October 1, 2007 at 17:38:23 +0200, Alain Guibert wrote:
We can also try to make adjtimex less sensible to system load. The
first step on this path [is commited into 1.23]
Now a small second step: The first timestamp in a serie is less accurate
than the following ones. The
Hello,
On Monday, September 24, 2007 at 6:06:17 -0400, A. Costa wrote:
It seems 'adjtimex' is quite clock CPU dependent;
Yes, of course: adjtimex --adjust operation (and some others) does read
the CMOS clock. On a system busy doing other things, the timings can be
degraded, possibly very
Package: adjtimex
Version: 1.22-1
Severity: normal
During an upgrade while running CPU hog 'qemu' in
the background:
Setting up adjtimex (1.22-1) ...
Regulating system clock...done.
Comparing clocks (this will take 70 sec)...adjtimex: Invalid argument
done.
Adjusting system
3 matches
Mail list logo
