Bug#443908: /etc/logcheck/ignore.d.server/bind: [bind] unexpected RCODE (NOTIMP)

2007-09-24 Thread Frédéric Brière
Package: logcheck-database Version: 1.2.61 Severity: wishlist File: /etc/logcheck/ignore.d.server/bind After #437891, I got yet another new unexpected RCODE, this time NOTIMP. As I was starting to get pissed off, I copied the whole list out of lib/dns/result.c, in an attempt to put an end to my

Bug#443908: /etc/logcheck/ignore.d.server/bind: [bind] unexpected RCODE (NOTIMP)

2007-09-24 Thread Justin Pryzby
On Mon, Sep 24, 2007 at 06:33:07PM -0400, Frédéric Brière wrote: Package: logcheck-database Version: 1.2.61 Severity: wishlist File: /etc/logcheck/ignore.d.server/bind After #437891, I got yet another new unexpected RCODE, this time NOTIMP. As I was starting to get pissed off, I copied

Bug#443908: /etc/logcheck/ignore.d.server/bind: [bind] unexpected RCODE (NOTIMP)

2007-09-24 Thread Frédéric Brière
On Mon, Sep 24, 2007 at 06:55:34PM -0400, Justin Pryzby wrote: Aren't some of these worth reporting? eg. REFUSED and NOTAUTH are probably okay for a workstation. But regardless of whether that would be better or not, you can't let them through at workstation level without opening the

Bug#443908: /etc/logcheck/ignore.d.server/bind: [bind] unexpected RCODE (NOTIMP)

2007-09-24 Thread Justin Pryzby
On Mon, Sep 24, 2007 at 11:09:10PM -0400, Frédéric Brière wrote: On Mon, Sep 24, 2007 at 06:55:34PM -0400, Justin Pryzby wrote: Aren't some of these worth reporting? eg. REFUSED and NOTAUTH are probably okay for a workstation. But regardless of whether that would be better or not, you