tag 444509 patch
thanks
Lucas Nussbaum [EMAIL PROTECTED] (29/09/2007):
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
please find attached the patch for my NMU.
Mentors, please someone checks and uploads grig with the attached
debdiff, e.g. to DELAYED/5. I'm requesting it here since the IRC
channel is
Hi,
please find attached the patch for my NMU.
autotools-dev contains a proper config.guess and config.sub, better copy
them at build time and remove the files later (or make a backup of the
original files and move them back), that's a much shorter and clearer
patch then yours, also it will
Bernd Zeimetz [EMAIL PROTECTED] (09/10/2007):
Hi,
Hi.
Thanks for not putting the subscribers in Cc unless they ask for it.
autotools-dev contains a proper config.guess and config.sub, better
copy them at build time and remove the files later (or make a backup
of the original files and move
Hi,
I could have stripped these parts from the diff, but they would be added
anyway,
no, you can just remove them in your clean target.
so what's your point? Playing around with config.* backups is
what I call “ugly”.
Then don't do it, see above.
And since the maintainer isn't using any
Bernd Zeimetz [EMAIL PROTECTED] (09/10/2007):
I could have stripped these parts from the diff, but they would be
added anyway,
no, you can just remove them in your clean target.
The point is exactly about adding them in the clean target, so that
their being up-to-date is ensured during the
I didn't read the discussion before, but I think I know what it's about
anyway, and I'd like to say something about it. :-)
On Tue, Oct 09, 2007 at 07:51:48PM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
Bernd Zeimetz [EMAIL PROTECTED] (09/10/2007):
I could have stripped these parts from the diff, but they
tag 444509 pending
thanks
Cyril Brulebois [EMAIL PROTECTED] (09/10/2007):
Mentors, please someone checks and uploads grig with the attached
debdiff, e.g. to DELAYED/5. I'm requesting it here since the IRC
channel is quite quiet today.
Hi. Julien Blache uploaded it to DELAYED/5 some minutes
On 10/9/07, Cyril Brulebois [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Exactly because they are handled in the clean target, from which you
propose to remove them. I might have troubles understanding your logic,
if any.
You remove them in the clean target, and copy them back in a later
target after the source
Package: grig
version: 0.7.2-1
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20070928 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386.
Relevant part:
i486-linux-gnu-gcc: defs: linker input file unused because
9 matches
Mail list logo
