On 10/9/07, Cyril Brulebois <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Exactly because they are handled in the clean target, from which you
> propose to remove them. I might have troubles understanding your logic,
> if any.
You remove them in the clean target, and copy them back in a later
target after the sour
tag 444509 pending
thanks
Cyril Brulebois <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (09/10/2007):
> Mentors, please someone checks and uploads grig with the attached
> debdiff, e.g. to DELAYED/5. I'm requesting it here since the IRC
> channel is quite quiet today.
Hi. Julien Blache uploaded it to DELAYED/5 some minute
I didn't read the discussion before, but I think I know what it's about
anyway, and I'd like to say something about it. :-)
On Tue, Oct 09, 2007 at 07:51:48PM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Bernd Zeimetz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (09/10/2007):
> > > I could have stripped these parts from the diff, but
Bernd Zeimetz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (09/10/2007):
> > I could have stripped these parts from the diff, but they would be
> > added anyway,
>
> no, you can just remove them in your clean target.
The point is exactly about adding them in the clean target, so that
their being up-to-date is ensured dur
Hi,
> I could have stripped these parts from the diff, but they would be added
> anyway,
no, you can just remove them in your clean target.
> so what's your point? Playing around with config.* backups is
> what I call “ugly”.
Then don't do it, see above.
> And since the maintainer isn't using
Bernd Zeimetz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (09/10/2007):
> Hi,
Hi.
Thanks for not putting the subscribers in Cc unless they ask for it.
> autotools-dev contains a proper config.guess and config.sub, better
> copy them at build time and remove the files later (or make a backup
> of the original files and
Hi,
> please find attached the patch for my NMU.
autotools-dev contains a proper config.guess and config.sub, better copy
them at build time and remove the files later (or make a backup of the
original files and move them back), that's a much shorter and clearer
patch then yours, also it will mak
tag 444509 patch
thanks
Lucas Nussbaum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (29/09/2007):
> Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
please find attached the patch for my NMU.
Mentors, please someone checks and uploads grig with the attached
debdiff, e.g. to DELAYED/5. I'm requesting it here since the IRC
channel is qu
Package: grig
version: 0.7.2-1
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20070928 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386.
Relevant part:
i486-linux-gnu-gcc: defs: linker input file unused because
9 matches
Mail list logo
