On Sun, 30 Sep 2007 at 19:17:59 -0500, Chris Lawrence wrote:
Note that /etc/lsb-release is not specified by the Linux Standard
Base; only the lsb_release command is
See also #659853, requesting /etc/os-release, which basically exists
because the LSB doesn't specify /etc/lsb_release as API. Its
On Thu, 8 Apr 2010, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
If you add /etc/lsb_release to base-files, please give us in the
Debian Edu a early warning, as our debian-edu-config package already
include the file.
I'm thinking about adding lsb_release to base-files, but that will be
in either case after the
[Santiago Vila]
I'm thinking about adding lsb_release to base-files, but that will
be in either case after the dust of umask has settle down...
Why? I fail to see the advantage, and only see problems for those
needing/wanting one like Debian Edu. It is obviously not needed at
the moment, as
On Thu, 8 Apr 2010, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
If you add /etc/lsb_release to base-files, please give us in the
Debian Edu a early warning, as our debian-edu-config package already
include the file.
I'd appreciate some input on this bug.
Why do we need the file? What it is used for?
It is
If you add /etc/lsb_release to base-files, please give us in the
Debian Edu a early warning, as our debian-edu-config package already
include the file.
Happy hacking,
--
Petter Reinholdtsen
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe.
On Tue, 2 Oct 2007, Robert Millan wrote:
On Sun, Sep 30, 2007 at 07:17:59PM -0500, Chris Lawrence wrote:
On 9/30/07, Robert Millan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Package: base-files
Version: 4.0.1
Severity: normal
lsb-release README.Debian says:
Distribution-specific
I don't remember well about the context of this discussion, but ...
On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 12:11:32PM +0200, Santiago Vila wrote:
IMHO, if the only benefit for this is to backport packages from
derived distributions, we might instead backport the same package from
Debian, if it's a free
On Sun, Sep 30, 2007 at 07:17:59PM -0500, Chris Lawrence wrote:
On 9/30/07, Robert Millan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Package: base-files
Version: 4.0.1
Severity: normal
lsb-release README.Debian says:
Distribution-specific information should be *separately provided* in
Package: base-files
Version: 4.0.1
Severity: normal
lsb-release README.Debian says:
Distribution-specific information should be *separately provided* in
/etc/lsb-release; it is no longer provided in this package. It is my
hope that in Debian, this will be managed by the base-files
On 9/30/07, Robert Millan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Package: base-files
Version: 4.0.1
Severity: normal
lsb-release README.Debian says:
Distribution-specific information should be *separately provided* in
/etc/lsb-release; it is no longer provided in this package. It is my
hope that
10 matches
Mail list logo
