On Tue, 2008-09-09 at 12:17 +0200, Daniel Baumann wrote:
> I just saw there are nvidia-modules for 2.6.26-1 in the archive. Rather
> than building them on your own, they should really be build with
> linux-modules-nonfree-2.6. That is now pending for almost a year.
>
We had them building with 2.6.
On Tue, Sep 09, 2008 at 12:17:14PM +0200, Daniel Baumann wrote:
> I just saw there are nvidia-modules for 2.6.26-1 in the archive. Rather
> than building them on your own, they should really be build with
> linux-modules-nonfree-2.6. That is now pending for almost a year.
Yep. I got it working wi
On Tue, 2008-04-08 at 10:15 +0200, Daniel Baumann wrote:
> Hi Randy,
>
> the current version still does not work with lme, what is the status of
> this, are you still interested to fix it?
>
I am interested still but have not got it to work yet.
> Regards,
> Daniel
>
--
---
Randall Donald wrote:
> Is there a specific target that is looked for in the Makefile? I've
> tried a few things but I can't get it to build.
i had a look at it. your Makefile is a rules files, rather than a kernel
module makefile. you'll find the information you require at the end of
this message
On Wed, 2008-02-06 at 09:11 +0100, Daniel Baumann wrote:
> Randall Donald wrote:
> > I've added the files to my subversion repo.
>
> i've checked out r358 and wanted to test it, but the nvidia package
> doesn't build:
Thanks, I fixed that.
> checkout linux-modules-nonfree-2.6, run debian/rules
Randall Donald wrote:
> I've added the files to my subversion repo.
i've checked out r358 and wanted to test it, but the nvidia package
doesn't build:
---snip---
[...]
dh_installdeb
dh_shlibdeps -Xia32 -Xtls
-l/home/user/nvidia-graphics-drivers-169.09/debian/nvidia-glx/usr/lib
dpkg-shlibdeps: wa
> When do you think you can add the missing peaces? Would you like me to
> prepare a patch?
>
I've added the files to my subversion repo. Is there a command syntax
that you use that I can test it with?
--
Randall Donald [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Randall Donald wrote:
> hi Daniel,
Hi,
> Unfortunately, I haven't worked on it in a while. From what I understand
> from the aufs source it's advisable to use a common file to set up the
> environment and configuration for both the rules and Makefile.
Not necessarily, can be also everything in
On Thu, 2008-01-31 at 10:02 +0100, Daniel Baumann wrote:
> Hi,
>
> what is the status of the nvidia packages? would be nice to have the
> 2.6.24-1 upload of the binary mdules on behalf of linux-modules-nonfree-2.6.
>
hi Daniel,
Unfortunately, I haven't worked on it in a while. From what I unde
Ok, I checked nvidia-kernel-source, the following things needs to be
changed:
* the tarball in /usr/src needs to be nvidia-kernel.tar.bz2, not
nvidia-kernel-source.tar.gz.
* provide a top-leval makefile in modules/nvidia-kernel, so that the
module is buildable with the normal $(MAKE)
Randall Donald wrote:
> You description says that new uploads are made for each kernel change,
> but what about each driver version change?
In theory, a driver changes means binNMU of the conglomeration module
package, scheduled by a release-team member as usual, on request of the
module maintaine
> In short: Please consider letting your module be integrated into the
> conglomeration package, so that the users can install prebuild module
> binary packages for the Debian default kernel flavours.
>
I already provide prebuilt modules but I find your packaging proposal
interesting.
I have a
12 matches
Mail list logo
