On Thu, Feb 5, 2009 at 11:22 PM, Lukasz Szybalski szybal...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Feb 5, 2009 at 12:45 PM, martin f krafft madd...@debian.org wrote:
also sprach Lukasz Szybalski szybal...@gmail.com [2009.02.05.0731 +0100]:
Both drives are fairly new...Would the drive be defective since day1?
also sprach Lukasz Szybalski szybal...@gmail.com [2009.02.05.0731 +0100]:
Both drives are fairly new...Would the drive be defective since day1?
Was the error log that I am getting now available in previous version
of the kernel?
Yes.
Either the drives are faulty or the controller.
--
On Thu, Feb 5, 2009 at 12:45 PM, martin f krafft madd...@debian.org wrote:
also sprach Lukasz Szybalski szybal...@gmail.com [2009.02.05.0731 +0100]:
Both drives are fairly new...Would the drive be defective since day1?
Was the error log that I am getting now available in previous version
of
also sprach Lukasz Szybalski szybal...@gmail.com [2009.02.04.0655 +0100]:
3. I then readded my /dev/hda2 to /dev/md2 and a lot of errors
started to appear in syslog...
[...]
Feb 3 23:49:09 hplinux kernel: hdc: dma_intr: status=0x51 {
DriveReady SeekComplete Error }
Looks like your
Both drives are fairly new...Would the drive be defective since day1?
Was the error log that I am getting now available in previous version
of the kernel?
Thanks,
Lucas
On Wed, Feb 4, 2009 at 3:12 AM, martin f krafft madd...@debian.org wrote:
also sprach Lukasz Szybalski szybal...@gmail.com
On Sun, Jan 4, 2009 at 9:26 PM, Lukasz Szybalski szybal...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Jan 4, 2009 at 8:55 AM, Moritz Muehlenhoff j...@inutil.org wrote:
fOn Wed, Oct 17, 2007 at 04:16:39PM -0500, Lukasz Szybalski wrote:
On 10/15/07, Neil Brown ne...@suse.de wrote:
As you say, the devices are
fOn Wed, Oct 17, 2007 at 04:16:39PM -0500, Lukasz Szybalski wrote:
On 10/15/07, Neil Brown ne...@suse.de wrote:
As you say, the devices are exactly the same size, thanks.
On Monday October 15, szybal...@gmail.com wrote:
how do I undo? mdadm /dev/md2 -f /dev/hda2
So I could try
On Sun, Jan 4, 2009 at 8:55 AM, Moritz Muehlenhoff j...@inutil.org wrote:
fOn Wed, Oct 17, 2007 at 04:16:39PM -0500, Lukasz Szybalski wrote:
On 10/15/07, Neil Brown ne...@suse.de wrote:
As you say, the devices are exactly the same size, thanks.
On Monday October 15, szybal...@gmail.com
also sprach Neil Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007.10.16.0043 +0100]:
I was hoping for
cat /proc/partitions
and maybe even
fdisk -l /dev/hda /dev/hdb
In the future, consider asking for
/usr/share/bug/mdadm/script 31
which should have *all* the output you could ever want. :)
In future
On 10/15/07, Neil Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As you say, the devices are exactly the same size, thanks.
On Monday October 15, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
how do I undo? mdadm /dev/md2 -f /dev/hda2
So I could try the sync in init 1
Lucas
Well, you could:
mdadm /dev/md2 -f
On 10/12/07, Neil Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Friday October 12, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
yes I have.
Then I tried booting in knoppix to see if maybe there are hdd problems
so I run e2fsck on both drives to see if there are any issues.
reboot and it still does the same thing.
Ok,
On 10/15/07, Neil Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Monday October 15, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
seems as the size is the same?
seems.
I was hoping for
cat /proc/partitions
hplinux:/home/lucas# cat /proc/partitions
major minor #blocks name
3 0 312571224 hda
3 1
On Monday October 15, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
seems as the size is the same?
seems.
I was hoping for
cat /proc/partitions
and maybe even
fdisk -l /dev/hda /dev/hdb
I should have been more specific.
NeilBrown
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of
As you say, the devices are exactly the same size, thanks.
On Monday October 15, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
how do I undo? mdadm /dev/md2 -f /dev/hda2
So I could try the sync in init 1
Lucas
Well, you could:
mdadm /dev/md2 -f /dev/hda2
mdadm /dev/md2 -r /dev/hda2
then when you are
On 10/11/07, Neil Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thursday October 11, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Package: mdadm
Version: 2.5.6-9
Severity: normal
Hello,
I am trying to setup raid1 on my pc.
I have 2 identical drives. 270+gb. each with 3 partitions.
30gb hdb1 - md0
250gb hdb2
On 10/12/07, Neil Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Friday October 12, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
yes I have.
Then I tried booting in knoppix to see if maybe there are hdd problems
so I run e2fsck on both drives to see if there are any issues.
reboot and it still does the same thing.
Ok,
On Friday October 12, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
yes I have.
Then I tried booting in knoppix to see if maybe there are hdd problems
so I run e2fsck on both drives to see if there are any issues.
reboot and it still does the same thing.
Ok, it must be caused by some persistent state.
Could you
Package: mdadm
Version: 2.5.6-9
Severity: normal
Hello,
I am trying to setup raid1 on my pc.
I have 2 identical drives. 270+gb. each with 3 partitions.
30gb hdb1 - md0
250gb hdb2 -md2
4gb swap hdb5 -md4
Initially my raid had only one drive. I have added the second one with
mdadm --add
On Thursday October 11, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Package: mdadm
Version: 2.5.6-9
Severity: normal
Hello,
I am trying to setup raid1 on my pc.
I have 2 identical drives. 270+gb. each with 3 partitions.
30gb hdb1 - md0
250gb hdb2 -md2
4gb swap hdb5 -md4
Initially my raid had only
19 matches
Mail list logo
