Hi,
> By the way, a suggestion for the names of packages: is it possible
> to change ghostscript-x to ghostscript, and rename ghostscript to
> ghostscript-nox? This naming policy may be more consistent with
> other debian packages. e.g., vim and vim-nox, emacs22 and
> emacs22-nox, etc.
Thanks fo
Package: ghostscript
Version: 8.61.dfsg.1~svn8187-1
Severity: serious
the new ghostscript Provides gs and gs-*, but doesn't provide their
functionality. This breaks e.g. gv, which now requires ghostscript-x
but depends on gs-gpl | gs.
Please move the Provides to ghostscript-x, or make ghostscript
2 matches
Mail list logo
