Bug#447860: fails to start, leaves stray processes around

2007-11-01 Thread François LEIBER
Yes I use mdadm. Michael Biebl wrote: François LEIBER schrieb: I confirm that this bug is annoying: not only does it prevent hal to work (I confirm the processes left running), but it also messes up all packages updates which depend on hal. Example at every update since more than a week: Setti

Bug#447860: fails to start, leaves stray processes around

2007-10-31 Thread Blaž Lorger
I've also experienced this bug. I'm using software RAID (madm). My distribution is amd64 / unstable. Blaz -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#447860: fails to start, leaves stray processes around

2007-10-31 Thread Michael Biebl
François LEIBER schrieb: > I confirm that this bug is annoying: not only does it prevent hal to > work (I confirm the processes left running), but it also messes up all > packages updates which depend on hal. > Example at every update since more than a week: > > Setting up hal (0.5.10-2) ... > Rel

Bug#447860: fails to start, leaves stray processes around

2007-10-31 Thread François LEIBER
I confirm that this bug is annoying: not only does it prevent hal to work (I confirm the processes left running), but it also messes up all packages updates which depend on hal. Example at every update since more than a week: Setting up hal (0.5.10-2) ... Reloading system message bus config...d

Bug#447860: fails to start, leaves stray processes around

2007-10-24 Thread martin f krafft
Package: hal Version: 0.5.10-1 Severity: serious This is serious because dpkg fails to upgrade hal, since the init.d script exits with code 1. Here is what's going on: piper$ sudo /etc/init.d/hal stop Stopping Hardware abstraction layer: hald. piper$ ps aux | grep hal piper$ sudo hald --daemon=