tags 448616 confirmed
thanks
-=| Hamish Moffatt, Wed, Oct 31, 2007 at 08:06:20AM +1100 |=-
Please, could we discuss the issue before you close it?
Sure. I closed it to not forget it later (in the case that you agree
there is no bug).
-=| Hamish Moffatt, Tue, Oct 30, 2007 at 11:54:47PM +1100
On Wed, Oct 31, 2007 at 11:35:05AM +0200, Damyan Ivanov wrote:
-=| Hamish Moffatt, Wed, Oct 31, 2007 at 08:06:20AM +1100 |=-
No, you can disable all xinetd-provided services and use inetd
implementation of your choice.
No you can't, because xinetd diverts openbsd-inetd's binary.
This
-=| Hamish Moffatt, Wed, Oct 31, 2007 at 08:53:28PM +1100 |=-
Yes that sounds good.
OK. I'll proceed with this plan. Thanks for sharing your opinoon (and
moving me out of my letargy re firebird :)
I was a bit confused that despite selecting which firebird server I
wanted enabled in the
retitle 448616 firebird2.0-classic: dependency on xinetd is unnecessary
thanks
Sorry, I should have been more reasonable in my description. :-|
Hamish
--
Hamish Moffatt VK3SB [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe.
Package: firebird2.0-classic
Version: 2.0.3.12981.ds1-1
Severity: important
firebird2.0-classic's dependency on xinetd forces this to be the
superserver of choice on the server. However there does not appear to be
any particular need for the inetd to be xinetd.
Forcing xinetd on your users is
notfound 448616 2.0.3.12981.ds1-1
close 448616
[re-sent to the bug log too]
-=| Hamish Moffatt, Tue, Oct 30, 2007 at 11:54:47PM +1100 |=-
firebird2.0-classic's dependency on xinetd forces this to be the
superserver of choice on the server.
No, you can disable all xinetd-provided services and
reopen 448616
found 448616 2.0.3.12981.ds1-1
On Tue, Oct 30, 2007 at 05:52:50PM +0200, Damyan Ivanov wrote:
notfound 448616 2.0.3.12981.ds1-1
close 448616
Please, could we discuss the issue before you close it?
-=| Hamish Moffatt, Tue, Oct 30, 2007 at 11:54:47PM +1100 |=-
7 matches
Mail list logo
