Bug#449433: Should a package supply libgfortran.so and libgfortranbegin.a in /usr/lib?

2007-11-21 Thread Matthias Klose
Kevin B. McCarty writes: Package: gfortran-4.2 Version: 4.2.2-3 Severity: minor Hi Matthias et al., Prompted by a couple emails [1] to the ROOT devel list, I'm curious as to why no package in Sid seems to provide a libgfortran.so symlink [without the soversion] nor libgfortranbegin.a

Bug#449433: Should a package supply libgfortran.so and libgfortranbegin.a in /usr/lib?

2007-11-05 Thread Kevin B. McCarty
Package: gfortran-4.2 Version: 4.2.2-3 Severity: minor Hi Matthias et al., Prompted by a couple emails [1] to the ROOT devel list, I'm curious as to why no package in Sid seems to provide a libgfortran.so symlink [without the soversion] nor libgfortranbegin.a directly in /usr/lib. This makes it