> The bug tracking system already understands that the bug isn't fixed
> in testing; we don't need to keep it open in unstable, which is why I
> closed it with the version fixing the bug.
Thanks a lot, Loïc! And keep up the good work. Debian always amazes me.
Epikuro.
Le mercredi 07 novembre 2007 à 20:19 +0100, Epikuro a écrit :
> > It's in unstable, but not uploaded for i386:
> > http://buildd.debian.org/~jeroen/status/package.php?suite=unstable&p=gtk%2B2.0
>
> I definitely think that this bug should remain open until it is fixed
> in testing.
Thanks to the
On Wed, Nov 07, 2007, Epikuro wrote:
> I definitely think that this bug should remain open until it is fixed
> in testing. I have a couple of non-functional machines because of
> this, and I would love to test the fix.
The bug tracking system already understands that the bug isn't fixed
in testi
> It's in unstable, but not uploaded for i386:
> http://buildd.debian.org/~jeroen/status/package.php?suite=unstable&p=gtk%2B2.0
I definitely think that this bug should remain open until it is fixed
in testing. I have a couple of non-functional machines because of
this, and I would love to test th
On Wed, Nov 07, 2007, Epikuro wrote:
> Where is that version? I don't see it either in testing or in
> unstable. Do you know when it will be available? The bug is against
> testing, I'm not sure how the debian process works but shouldn't it be
> left open until testing is fixed?
It's in unstable,
5 matches
Mail list logo