On Thu, Jan 03, 2008 at 08:15:14AM +0200, Yavor Doganov wrote:
Steve Langasek wrote:
Why is 456898 marked as a blocker for this bug?
Because in the process of resolving this unrelated bug I believe I got
hit by the same issue:
/usr/bin/../lib/libgsl.so.0: undefined reference to
Steve Langasek wrote:
Correct, it uses gnustep-make and I pass -Wl,-z,defs -Wl,--as-needed
in the new version of the package.
Ok, so it's not a blocker other than the fact that you've chosen to
modify the package in a way that it fails to build given the current
state of the archive.
Steve Langasek wrote:
Why is 456898 marked as a blocker for this bug?
Because in the process of resolving this unrelated bug I believe I got
hit by the same issue:
/usr/bin/../lib/libgsl.so.0: undefined reference to `cblas_ctrmv'
/usr/bin/../lib/libgsl.so.0: undefined reference to
Why is 456898 marked as a blocker for this bug? adun.app is a GNUstep
program, so should not be using qmake, which is the usage that 456898 claims
is broken; and adun.app does not itself pass -Wl,--as-needed during the
build. So why does this have anything to do with building adun.app (and
Package: adun.app
version: 0.6-3
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20071106 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386.
Relevant part:
/usr/bin/fakeroot debian/rules clean
dh_testdir
5 matches
Mail list logo
