Bug#452932: What do you mean?

2008-02-08 Thread David Paleino
reopen 452932 thanks Il giorno Sat, 9 Feb 2008 00:52:51 +1100 Ian Tester <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ha scritto: > On Fri, 8 Feb 2008 14:40:07 +0100 > David Paleino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Please try the new version in the Debian archive: as already stated, > > I made a patch which fixes this.

Bug#452932: What do you mean?

2008-02-08 Thread David Paleino
Il giorno Sat, 9 Feb 2008 00:31:36 +1100 Ian Tester <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ha scritto: > > ... > > I am still using the 2.8.0 version from November 2006 because this > little feature was removed. Please try the new version in the Debian archive: as already stated, I made a patch which fixes this.

Bug#452932: What do you mean?

2008-02-08 Thread Ian Tester
I mean that in version 2.8 there is an option in the preferences for "fit image to window". Not "if larger". Always. I have a 1600x1200 screen (not that uncommon nowadays) and there is still a lot of material that is smaller than the maximised window or fullscreen display. I don't want these image

Bug#452932: What do you mean?

2008-02-05 Thread David Paleino
Il giorno Tue, 5 Feb 2008 10:24:03 +0100 David Paleino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ha scritto: > With "unconditionally" do you mean that it fit the window also with a zoom > >100% (i.e. even if it was smaller than the window)? I forgot to say that, if you meant this, I've already fixed this in 3:2.10.8-1

Bug#452932: What do you mean?

2008-02-05 Thread David Paleino
tags 452932 +moreinfo thanks Hi, I've just adopted gthumb and am trying to fix all these bugs it has filed. Regarding this bug: what do you mean? Gthumb still has View > Zoom > Fit. And it fits the image to the window, proportionally, if it's larger. With "unconditionally" do you mean that it fit