On Thu, Dec 06, 2007 at 05:24:41AM +0100, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
> Yeah, that is a known limitation of dpkg.
>
> See also http://www.dpkg.org/dpkg/ConffileHandling
That document clearly says that dpkg does NOT remove old conffiles
during upgrades, and describes the steps for maintainers to do s
On Thu, Dec 06, 2007 at 07:28:03AM +0530, Kumar Appaiah wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 05, 2007 at 08:47:51PM +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> > As far as I understand, the file /etc/default/libzvbi0 was in the sarge
> > package but it's no more in the sid version of the package but the conf
> > files stays e
Dear Raphael,
Please CC me as well, as I am the submiter.
On Wed, Dec 05, 2007 at 08:47:51PM +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> As far as I understand, the file /etc/default/libzvbi0 was in the sarge
> package but it's no more in the sid version of the package but the conf
> files stays even after t
retitle 454379 obsolete conffiles are not deleted on purge
thanks
Hi,
On Wed, 05 Dec 2007, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> > reassign 454379 dpkg
> Bug#454379: libzvbi0 -- Doesn't purge all files after piuparts
> Install+Upgrade+Purge test
> Bug reassigned from package
reassign 454379 dpkg
thanks
Kumar Appaiah <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Wed, Dec 05, 2007 at 10:20:35AM +0100, Christian Marillat wrote:
>> > I have been analyzing packages for the piuparts test, and have
>> > observed that ~8 packages fail the piuparts because libzvbi0
>> > doesn't purge the
Package: libzvbi0
Version: 0.2.26-2
Severity: important
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: piuparts-stable-upgrade piuparts-stable-upgrade-20071130
Hi!
I have been analyzing packages for the piuparts test, and have
observed that ~8 packages fail the piuparts because libzvbi0
doesn't purge the some
6 matches
Mail list logo