Bug#454572: cernlib: [debconf_rewrite] Debconf templates and debian/control review

2007-12-10 Thread Kevin B. McCarty
Hi Christian, for what it's worth, I don't have any important objections to the diff for cernlib control file. I did feel that this revised text sounded a little odd: This metapackage provides the header files and static libraries needed by developers using the Cern libraries and not

Bug#454572: cernlib: [debconf_rewrite] Debconf templates and debian/control review

2007-12-06 Thread Christian Perrier
Package: cernlib Version: N/A Severity: normal Tags: patch Dear Debian maintainer, On Monday, November 19, 2007, I notified you of the beginning of a review process concerning debconf templates for cernlib. The debian-l10n-english contributors have now reviewed these templates, and the

Bug#454572: cernlib: [debconf_rewrite] Debconf templates and debian/control review

2007-12-06 Thread Kevin B. McCarty
Hi Christian, Christian Perrier wrote: Dear Debian maintainer, On Monday, November 19, 2007, I notified you of the beginning of a review process concerning debconf templates for cernlib. The debian-l10n-english contributors have now reviewed these templates, and the proposed changes

Bug#454572: cernlib: [debconf_rewrite] Debconf templates and debian/control review

2007-12-06 Thread Christian Perrier
Quoting Kevin B. McCarty ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): I have a procedural question -- should I take responsibility for closing this bug, #454572 (as well as all the others that will be submitted for the updated translations) in the next cernlib changelog entry once the changes and updated