* Martin Guy [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-01-09 17:53]:
Presumably right after boot without doing anything special?
No, after some kernel building. Right after a boot it's:
Strange, I've all zeroes right after a boot (with an OABI kernel).
--
Martin Michlmayr
http://www.cyrius.com/
--
To
Strange, I've all zeroes right after a boot (with an OABI kernel).
Here it's a vanilla Debian armel 2.6.23-1-iop32x kernel on
XScale-80219 rev 0 (v5l)
It's not serious as misaligned accesses in kernel are always trapped
and fixed up.
I'd be inclined to close this item for lack of importance.
2007/12/28, Martin Michlmayr [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I can reproduce this problem with 2.6.18-5 and 2.6.22-3, but not with
2.6.23-1 from unstable. Can you try 2.6.23?
The 2.6.23-2 kernel package I built from source will still not boot
from flash (a separate issue) but I can copy the
* Martin Guy [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-01-09 15:50]:
load them into redboot via http. That still gives:
Presumably right after boot without doing anything special?
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/$ uname -r
2.6.23-1-iop32x
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/$ cat /proc/cpu/alignment
User: 0
System:
2008/1/9, Martin Michlmayr [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Presumably right after boot without doing anything special?
No, after some kernel building. Right after a boot it's:
n2100:~# cat /proc/cpu/alignment
User: 0
System: 3928
Skipped:0
Half: 0
Word: 3928
* Martin Guy [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-12-12 09:29]:
After running for a mere 20 hours, /proc/cpu/alignment reports
millions of misaligned word accesses from the kernel:
$ cat /proc/cpu/alignment
User: 0
System: 2765980
I can reproduce this problem with 2.6.18-5 and 2.6.22-3,
* Martin Guy [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-12-28 17:15]:
make-kpkg all fail, gabbling about
/bin/sh: line 0: [: -lt: unary operator expected
/bin/sh: line 0: [: -eq: unary operator expected
Are you sure you have all build-deps installed for linux-2.6?
For example, the make-kpkg runes I'm using
* Martin Guy [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-12-28 17:15]:
The binary's not in the repo, and all my various attempts at building
it from the linux-2.6_2.6.23-1 Debian sources with dpkg-makepackage or
Riku, any idea why linux-2.6 2.6.23-2 hasn't been built for armel yet?
--
Martin Michlmayr
I can reproduce this problem with 2.6.18-5 and 2.6.22-3, but not with
2.6.23-1 from unstable. Can you try 2.6.23?
Seems I can't, no, having spent a day trying. But then I never built a
kernel package before, so that doesn't mean much. After most of a day
trying I'm giving up. Can you give me a
On Fri, Dec 28, 2007 at 06:44:20PM +0100, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
* Martin Guy [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-12-28 17:15]:
The binary's not in the repo, and all my various attempts at building
it from the linux-2.6_2.6.23-1 Debian sources with dpkg-makepackage or
as mentioned in ArmEabiTodo,
Hi!
The armel port is still blocked on this item. The bugfix was
submitted over 7 months ago and included over a month a go in version
control.
If possible, would you expedite an upload of the new version please?
These timescales are glacial!
Thanks
M
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL
On Wed, Dec 12, 2007 at 06:58:04PM -0700, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
* Martin Guy [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-12-12 09:29]:
After running for a mere 20 hours, /proc/cpu/alignment reports
millions of misaligned word accesses from the kernel:
$ cat /proc/cpu/alignment
I'm away from my N2100 at the
Package: linux-image-2.6-iop32x
Version: 2.6.22+11
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: eabi
Severity: wishlist
After running for a mere 20 hours, /proc/cpu/alignment reports
millions of misaligned word accesses from the kernel:
$ cat /proc/cpu/alignment
User: 0
System: 2765980
On Wed, Dec 12, 2007 at 09:29:57AM -0500, Martin Guy wrote:
Package: linux-image-2.6-iop32x
Version: 2.6.22+11
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: eabi
Severity: wishlist
After running for a mere 20 hours, /proc/cpu/alignment reports
millions of misaligned word accesses from the kernel:
$
[ cc bug report readded ]
On Wed, Dec 12, 2007 at 11:47:14AM -0500, Martin Guy wrote:
I *am* running armel unstable, and the latest is 2.6.22-3-iop32x. Do I
need to wait for the buildds to get round to recompiling it?
M
latest linux-2.6 should build linux image 2.6.23-1-iop32x pls
* maximilian attems [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-12-12 18:34]:
On Wed, Dec 12, 2007 at 11:47:14AM -0500, Martin Guy wrote:
I *am* running armel unstable, and the latest is 2.6.22-3-iop32x. Do I
need to wait for the buildds to get round to recompiling it?
M
latest linux-2.6 should
* Martin Guy [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-12-12 09:29]:
After running for a mere 20 hours, /proc/cpu/alignment reports
millions of misaligned word accesses from the kernel:
$ cat /proc/cpu/alignment
I'm away from my N2100 at the moment so I cannot check if I see this
as well. Do you think you
17 matches
Mail list logo
