MAFM> Current status: there are 287 updates available (4 added from last
MAFM> run), 4629 newly available packages (3 less compared to last run), 3
MAFM> broken packages left (3 new from last run).
I think I pretty much understand what that is finally saying, for what
it's worth.
By the way, th
2015-09-10 13:28 GMT+01:00 積丹尼 Dan Jacobson :
> All I know is
>
> "No packages will be installed, upgraded, or removed.
> 0 packages upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 3 not upgraded.
> Need to get 0 B of archives. After unpacking 0 B will be used."
>
> is totally understandable by me,
N
2015-09-10 12:43 GMT+01:00 Sami Liedes :
> On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 12:14:29PM +0100, Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo wrote:
>> > Isn't it bad to output something the user doesn't understand even if
>> > they didn't use -v?
>>
>> I disagree with users not understanding that, or that being a big
>> pro
All I know is
"No packages will be installed, upgraded, or removed.
0 packages upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 3 not upgraded.
Need to get 0 B of archives. After unpacking 0 B will be used."
is totally understandable by me,
So all that needs to be done is have that mystery line of g
On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 12:14:29PM +0100, Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo wrote:
> > Isn't it bad to output something the user doesn't understand even if
> > they didn't use -v?
>
> I disagree with users not understanding that, or that being a big
> problem. The first message, "There are 0 new [-1]
2015-09-10 4:42 GMT+01:00 :
> MAFM> Anyway, in the end I changed it only slightly, "aptitude -v update":
>
> How about for plain aptitude, no -v.
> I (happily) remember 10 years ago there was no such message.
As I see it, the problem is that if we remove the message after being
there several year
MAFM> Anyway, in the end I changed it only slightly, "aptitude -v update":
How about for plain aptitude, no -v.
I (happily) remember 10 years ago there was no such message.
Isn't it bad to output something the user doesn't understand even if
they didn't use -v?
Or maybe there should be a way to f
Control: tags 588237 + pending
Hi all,
I reply primarily to this bug report because the message is slightly
different now; but I am including all bug reports and submitters here.
The previous incarnation of the message was like "There are 0 new [-1]".
2010-07-06 12:24 jida...@jidanni.org:
P
8 matches
Mail list logo
