Bug#459399: [vim]

2009-01-01 Thread Frederik Schwarzer
Package: vim Version: 2:7.2.049-2 --- Please enter the report below this line. --- I now created a file with multiple shorter lines (about 800 chars). for k in `seq 0 1000`; do for i in `seq 0 200`; do echo -n "$i " >>file.test; done; echo >>file.test; done for i in `seq 0 5000`;do cat file.tes

Bug#459399: [vim] does not see large files and overwrites them as new

2008-05-24 Thread Frederik Schwarzer
Package: vim Version: 1:7.1.293-3 --- Please enter the report below this line. --- Here a 4.7GB file filled with zeros doesn't load. For me it still feels weird that vim claims the file being a [New File] while loading, that one can work at the file as if it was a new file and then overwrites it

Bug#459399: vim does not see lage files and overwrites them as new on :wq

2008-02-28 Thread James Vega
On Sat, Feb 23, 2008 at 01:25:13AM -0500, James Vega wrote: > On Sun, Jan 06, 2008 at 07:45:18AM +0100, Frederik Schwarzer wrote: > > I have a large xml file (12,7 GiB) which I wanted to open in vim to > > check some things before sending it to a parser we use. > > vim says > > 'file.xml' [New File

Bug#459399: vim does not see lage files and overwrites them as new on :wq

2008-02-22 Thread James Vega
On Sun, Jan 06, 2008 at 07:45:18AM +0100, Frederik Schwarzer wrote: > I have a large xml file (12,7 GiB) which I wanted to open in vim to > check some things before sending it to a parser we use. > vim says > 'file.xml' [New File] > and shows an empty buffer. This seems to be a more base issue tha

Bug#459399: vim does not see lage files and overwrites them as new on :wq

2008-01-05 Thread Frederik Schwarzer
Package: vim Version: 1:7.1-175+2 Severity: normal I have a large xml file (12,7 GiB) which I wanted to open in vim to check some things before sending it to a parser we use. vim says 'file.xml' [New File] and shows an empty buffer. When I now (accidently) executed ":wq", vim overwrote the large x