Bug#459436: cowdancer: put cowbuilder in it's own package

Hi, On Mon, Jan 07, 2008 at 09:04:09AM +0900, Junichi Uekawa wrote: [...] I wonder how small it would become. I'm not too keen on splitting packages too much. pbuilder doesn't pull in any GUI tools, so it's not too bad. Is it worth splitting? What about turning the dependency-on-pbuilder

Bug#459436: cowdancer: put cowbuilder in it's own package

Package: cowdancer Version: 0.44 Severity: wishlist Hi Junichi, recently I wanted to install cowdancer to try cow-shell, but unfortunately it brought a whole lot of dependencies due to the pbuilder dependency. Since cow-shell may be useful on it's own (e.g. working with hardlinked copies of

Bug#459436: cowdancer: put cowbuilder in it's own package

Hi, recently I wanted to install cowdancer to try cow-shell, but unfortunately it brought a whole lot of dependencies due to the pbuilder dependency. Since cow-shell may be useful on it's own (e.g. working with hardlinked copies of large source trees) I'd suggest to move cowbuilder (and