Bug#460465: ruby-full: should this package be merged in ruby-defaults?

2008-01-14 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
reassign 460465 ruby-defaults retitle 460465 ruby-defaults: add ruby-full package thanks On 13/01/08 at 20:57 +0100, Vincent Fourmond wrote: > > Hello Lucas, > > Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > > I am now working on the ruby-defaults package, which provides ruby, irb, > > rdoc, etc ... binary packages.

Bug#460465: ruby-full: should this package be merged in ruby-defaults?

2008-01-13 Thread Vincent Fourmond
Hello Lucas, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > I am now working on the ruby-defaults package, which provides ruby, irb, > rdoc, etc ... binary packages. > > It would probably make more sense to merge ruby-full in the > ruby-defaults source package. > > What do you think? It is where it belongs, go a

Bug#460465: ruby-full: should this package be merged in ruby-defaults?

2008-01-12 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
Package: ruby-full Version: 0.2 Hi Vincent, I am now working on the ruby-defaults package, which provides ruby, irb, rdoc, etc ... binary packages. It would probably make more sense to merge ruby-full in the ruby-defaults source package. What do you think? -- | Lucas Nussbaum | [EMAIL PROTECTE