reassign 460562 subversion
thanks
On Sun, Jan 13, 2008 at 07:46:13PM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote:
Can't you link Subversion against Berkeley DB 4.6? According to a
report on the Subversion mailing list, the current version passes its
test suite unchanged even when using Berkeley DB.
--
To
reassign 460562 db
thanks
Sorry, it's not as simple as that; it impacts on more than one other package.
If you want to get everyone to use libdb4.6 instead of explicitly
4.[2345] (which would be a Good Thing, assuming 4.6 is
backward-compatible with all the others), then I think you need to
file
On Sun, Jan 13, 2008 at 08:07:20PM +, Martin Guy wrote:
Sorry, it's not as simple as that; it impacts on more than one other package.
If you want to get everyone to use libdb4.6 instead of explicitly
4.[2345] (which would be a Good Thing, assuming 4.6 is
I certainly want that.
feel free to help out by adding to
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/[EMAIL PROTECTED];tag=oldbdb;dist=unstable
Can do. Should I ask them to change to requiring libdb-dev or libdb4.6-dev?
I.E. Is the future plan to keep one version only and simply increase
libdb's version number, or to carry on
4 matches
Mail list logo
