On Sun, 27 Jan 2008, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
That's a good start, but there is still some work to be done:
- The minimum dependencies on sparc should be 2.6-1 due to the SPARCV8
to SPARCV8PLUS ABI transition
I suggest to modify the headers in libc6.symbols.sparc to include
the dependency written
On Tue, Mar 04, 2008 at 10:54:10AM +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
On Sun, 27 Jan 2008, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
That's a good start, but there is still some work to be done:
- The minimum dependencies on sparc should be 2.6-1 due to the SPARCV8
to SPARCV8PLUS ABI transition
I suggest to
Aurelien Jarno a écrit :
Raphael Hertzog a écrit :
Package: glibc
Version: 2.7-6
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
Please add symbols files to the various libc* packages that provide
libraries. Since libc6 is sanely versioned I suggest to rely on that
to avoid maintaining explicit list of
Raphael Hertzog a écrit :
Package: glibc
Version: 2.7-6
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
Please add symbols files to the various libc* packages that provide
libraries. Since libc6 is sanely versioned I suggest to rely on that
to avoid maintaining explicit list of symbols (wee wildcards in
Package: glibc
Version: 2.7-6
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
Please add symbols files to the various libc* packages that provide
libraries. Since libc6 is sanely versioned I suggest to rely on that
to avoid maintaining explicit list of symbols (wee wildcards in
dpkg-gensymbols(1) for
I'd be happy to help test a version of libc6 that uses symbol files on
armel. It'll take a while to compile it of course. :-)
--
see shy jo
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
6 matches
Mail list logo
