On Wed, Feb 06, 2008 at 08:00:44PM +0100, Andreas Metzler wrote:
> > > Is it clear at all yet whether the ABI breakage is in the C++ wrapper
> > > libpcrecpp0 or in the main library?
> > Yes, it's in the C++ wrapper.
> That limits the problem a lot. (Etch has only a single external rdev to
> it.)
On 2008-02-06 Mark Baker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 06, 2008 at 06:54:47PM +0100, Andreas Metzler wrote:
> > It simple rebuild would still break partial upgrades.
> Yes, I agree. I don't think rebuilding the reverse dependencies is the
> right solution.
> The changelog suggests tha
On Wed, Feb 06, 2008 at 06:54:47PM +0100, Andreas Metzler wrote:
> It simple rebuild would still break partial upgrades.
Yes, I agree. I don't think rebuilding the reverse dependencies is the
right solution.
The changelog suggests that the ABI change is un-necessary (it was an
attempt to fix a p
> Subject: Bug#463413: problem solved by recompiling the package !
> Resent-Date: Tue, 05 Feb 2008 23:48:03 +, Tue, 05 Feb 2008 23:48:03
> +
> Resent-From: Jérémy Lal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Resent-To: debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org
> Resent-CC: Sebastien Bacher <[EMA
i had the exact same error message, and a fresh compilation from source solved
it.
(unstable repository of course)
Jérémy.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
5 matches
Mail list logo
