Il giorno Tue, 5 Feb 2008 16:34:43 +0100
Ralf Wildenhues [EMAIL PROTECTED] ha scritto:
* David Paleino wrote on Tue, Feb 05, 2008 at 04:05:59PM CET:
http://pastebin.com/f54c9f170
http://pastebin.com/f4501fd89
This very much looks like a version mismatch between the
ltmain.sh and the
Package: libtool
Version: 2.1a+cvs1.2525+20071016-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
The package from experimental is unusable. In fact, libtool doesn't even
recognize --tag=CC or --mode=compile, or anything else (--features, for
example).
Here's a log of a gthumb build
* David Paleino wrote on Tue, Feb 05, 2008 at 04:05:59PM CET:
http://pastebin.com/f54c9f170
http://pastebin.com/f4501fd89
This very much looks like a version mismatch between the
ltmain.sh and the libtool.m4 (and other macro) files.
Maybe you used 1.5.x libtoolize?
Cheers,
Ralf
--
To
* David Paleino wrote on Tue, Feb 05, 2008 at 04:38:17PM CET:
Il giorno Tue, 5 Feb 2008 16:34:43 +0100
Ralf Wildenhues [EMAIL PROTECTED] ha scritto:
* David Paleino wrote on Tue, Feb 05, 2008 at 04:05:59PM CET:
http://pastebin.com/f54c9f170
http://pastebin.com/f4501fd89
This
* David Paleino wrote on Tue, Feb 05, 2008 at 08:32:21PM CET:
$ libtool --version
ltmain.sh (GNU libtool 1.2525 2007/10/16 22:45:48) 2.1a
This is irrelevant.
$ ./libtool --version
ltmain.sh (GNU libtool) 1.5.24 Debian 1.5.24-1ubuntu1 (1.1220.2.456 2007/06/24
02:25:32)
This is the bug.
tags wontfix
thanks
* David Paleino wrote on Tue, Feb 05, 2008 at 10:07:17PM CET:
Il giorno Tue, 5 Feb 2008 20:50:01 +0100
Ralf Wildenhues [EMAIL PROTECTED] ha scritto:
...
I don't recall how to mark a Debian bug as invalid/fixed.
Tag it as wontfix?
Done.
Thanks,
Ralf
--
To
Il giorno Tue, 5 Feb 2008 20:50:01 +0100
Ralf Wildenhues [EMAIL PROTECTED] ha scritto:
...
I don't recall how to mark a Debian bug as invalid/fixed.
Tag it as wontfix?
Thanks anyway, I'll have to read something about libtool.
Kindly,
David
--
. ''`. Debian maintainer |
7 matches
Mail list logo
