-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, Feb 18, 2008 at 10:12:11PM +, Enrico Zini wrote:
>On Mon, Feb 18, 2008 at 07:01:27PM +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
>
>> German Debian mirror is not responding currently and main one is dead
>> slow, so I give up on investigating grep and
On Mon, Feb 18, 2008 at 07:01:27PM +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> German Debian mirror is not responding currently and main one is dead
> slow, so I give up on investigating grep and gzip right now - but I bet
> they do as I propose: create symlinks in upstream install process, so
> that the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, Feb 18, 2008 at 04:23:05PM +, Enrico Zini wrote:
>On Mon, Feb 18, 2008 at 03:38:13PM +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
>
>> Oh - and you added some symlinks to the source, which are broken
>> until the golink binary it built. That's bad. You
On Mon, Feb 18, 2008 at 03:38:13PM +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> Oh - and you added some symlinks to the source, which are broken until
> the golink binary it built. That's bad. You should probably avoid those,
> and instead create the symlinks in the Makefile (install target).
I'm not sure
Package: gnome-utils
Severity: important
Version: 2.20.0.1-1
Tags: patch
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: kfreebsd
Hi,
the current version has unsatisfied Build-Depends on
linux-libc-dev under non-linux ports.
Please, could you exclude linux specific package in Build-Depends
by using "linux-
2008/2/18, Enrico Zini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Done and committed: give it a try. For kicks, I also implemented
> --secondary=facet to choose the facet to use instead of 'interface'.
>
> Note: --ftags can be a comma-separated list of tags, that will be ANDed:
> this means that you can do this, whi
On Wed, Feb 13, 2008 at 05:46:36AM +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> I suggest now a different approach that fulfills our needs without
> multiple applications:
> 4. Implement an --ftags option similar to that in ept-tags
Done and committed: give it a try. For kicks, I also implemented
--secon
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, Feb 12, 2008 at 09:46:48PM +, Enrico Zini wrote:
>On Tue, Feb 12, 2008 at 04:56:14PM +0100, Miriam Ruiz wrote:
>Wow, interesting.
>In the meantime, just because it was easy to do, I changed the engine
>to allow to customise the main facet
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
On Tue, Feb 12, 2008 at 08:45:01PM +0100, Alexander Schmehl wrote:
>* Jonas Smedegaard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [080212 17:42]:
>
>> ...but also, we'd really want to have a usable tool widely available for
>> educational use _now_ rather than whenever
On Tue, Feb 12, 2008 at 04:56:14PM +0100, Miriam Ruiz wrote:
> I'm a bit concerned that if people start to fork the whole project for
> different kind of searches, it can get a bit out of hand. In fact, it
> might turn into a nightmare for the security team. If the idea is to
> have different GoSo
Hi!
* Jonas Smedegaard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [080212 17:42]:
> ...but also, we'd really want to have a usable tool widely available for
> educational use _now_ rather than whenever you/we succeed in refactoring
> the code for a more general scope.
Looking at the patch you send, it should be fair
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi again, Miriam,
[reorganizing quoted text a bit...]
On Tue, Feb 12, 2008 at 04:56:14PM +0100, Miriam Ruiz wrote:
>2008/2/12, Jonas Smedegaard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> On Tue, Feb 12, 2008 at 03:12:56PM +0100, Miriam Ruiz wrote:
>> >I saw that you're
2008/2/12, Jonas Smedegaard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Tue, Feb 12, 2008 at 03:12:56PM +0100, Miriam Ruiz wrote:
> >I saw that you're thinking about forking GoPlay!... wouldn't you think
> >it would be best to join our efforts in a more flexible program that
> >could handle both sets of packages, an
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, Feb 12, 2008 at 03:12:56PM +0100, Miriam Ruiz wrote:
>I saw that you're thinking about forking GoPlay!...
...just an addition to my other mail sent a moment ago:
I didn't just consider it - I have already succeeded with the stunt!
You can pu
On Tue, Feb 12, 2008 at 03:12:56PM +0100, Miriam Ruiz wrote:
I saw that you're thinking about forking GoPlay!... wouldn't you think
it would be best to join our efforts in a more flexible program that
could handle both sets of packages, and probably be extensible to
others? I'm open for extra h
Hi Jonas,
I saw that you're thinking about forking GoPlay!... wouldn't you think
it would be best to join our efforts in a more flexible program that
could handle both sets of packages, and probably be extensible to
others? I'm open for extra help and ideas :)
Miry
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
16 matches
Mail list logo
