I'm wondering that why we do not use the binary built by the ds9
developing team? It's a little bigger but still acceptable.
See here, there is a binary for linux:
http://hea-www.harvard.edu/RD/ds9/
I would like to maintain the package if this is acceptable.
Cheers,
Hong Xu
--
To
The package is complicated due to inclusion of many sub-packages [0],
for one of which the source is not included in the original tarball
[1] and another is modified for the package [2]. Some more info is in
the README.Debian.
The current packaging diff leaves some room for improvement [3]. It
2 matches
Mail list logo
