Bug#466759: mailagent: General update after the debconf review process

2008-04-08 Thread Christian Perrier
Dear Debian maintainer, On Saturday, February 02, 2008, I sent you a notification about the beginning of a review action on debconf templates for mailagent. Then, I sent you a bug report with rewritten templates and announcing the beginning of the second phase of this action: call for translatio

Bug#466759: mailagent: General update after the debconf review process

2008-03-20 Thread Christian Perrier
Quoting Manoj Srivastava ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > Oh, I don't think I had a particular reason. I just copied it > from the example in the README, I think. Two spaces will be fine. OK. So, for the sake of it, here's the templates file I will use in the call for translation updates. Please

Bug#466759: mailagent: General update after the debconf review process

2008-03-20 Thread Manoj Srivastava
On Wed, 19 Mar 2008 22:56:23 +0100, Christian Perrier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > Quoting Manoj Srivastava ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): >> | Please enter the name of the organization as you want it to appear >> in | that header field. It is common practice to add a location, >> typically | a city name, t

Bug#466759: mailagent: General update after the debconf review process

2008-03-19 Thread Christian Perrier
Quoting Manoj Srivastava ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > The differences are minor, but, in my opinion, significant; > header field as opposed to line (a field in an RFC 2822 document has a > precise meaning, and could be composed of multiple lines -- yes, I am > pedantic), and the fact that the

Bug#466759: mailagent: General update after the debconf review process

2008-03-19 Thread Christian Perrier
Quoting Manoj Srivastava ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > | Please enter the name of the organization as you want it to appear in > | that header field. It is common practice to add a location, typically > | a city name, to the organization's name, for instance: > | University of Southern North Dakot

Bug#466759: mailagent: General update after the debconf review process

2008-03-19 Thread Manoj Srivastava
Hi folks, Firstly, many thanks for the effort you have put into my package. I am sorry I have been not participating in the discussion, but I have been away for 3 weeks out of the last 30 days, and am only just now catching up. I am using the long description as is, but I would

Bug#466759: mailagent: General update after the debconf review process

2008-03-11 Thread Christian Perrier
Dear Debian maintainer, On Saturday, February 02, 2008, I sent you a notification about the beginning of a review action on debconf templates for mailagent. Then, I sent you a bug report with rewritten templates and announcing the beginning of the second phase of this action: call for translatio