On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 06:09:53PM -0500, Jameson Rollins wrote:
On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 10:23:06PM +, Gerrit Pape wrote:
Currently update-service --add doesn't touch the ./supervise/
subdirectories if service-dir/supervise already exists and is a
symlink. So the cereal package could
Hey, Gerrit. These patches look great. They look like they easily
address all the issues I had. Thanks so much for the quick responses
and all the great work.
jamie.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Package: runit
Version: 1.8.0-2
Severity: normal
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I think that the current practice of replacing any supervise
directories in the service directory with links to /var/run is
probably the right thing to do. However, this has the adverse
consequence
On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 12:33:33PM -0500, Jameson Rollins wrote:
I think that the current practice of replacing any supervise
directories in the service directory with links to /var/run is
probably the right thing to do. However, this has the adverse
consequence of not being able to maintain
On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 10:23:06PM +, Gerrit Pape wrote:
Currently update-service --add doesn't touch the ./supervise/
subdirectories if service-dir/supervise already exists and is a
symlink. So the cereal package could create symlinks pointing to
elsewhere in the filesystem before
5 matches
Mail list logo
