Bug#467001: signing-party: [gpg-key2ps] allow suppressing revoked subkeys

2008-02-27 Thread Thijs Kinkhorst
Hi Luca, On Friday 22 February 2008 13:00, Luca Capello wrote: my GPG key 0x9DDB992B contains revoked subkeys, which are normally not shown.  However, since gpg-key2ps invokes gpg with the '--with-colons' option, these subkeys are present in the output. One possibility would be having the

Bug#467001: signing-party: [gpg-key2ps] allow suppressing revoked subkeys

2008-02-27 Thread Luca Capello
Hi Thijs! On Wed, 27 Feb 2008 11:52:41 +0100, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote: On Friday 22 February 2008 13:00, Luca Capello wrote: One possibility would be having the --revoked-style option general, i.e. not only for uids, but also for subkeys.  Another one would mean introducing a new option,

Bug#467001: signing-party: [gpg-key2ps] allow suppressing revoked subkeys

2008-02-27 Thread Thijs Kinkhorst
On Wednesday 27 February 2008 14:40, Luca Capello wrote: I prefer the first option, because I don't see why someone would like to treat in a different way the revoked uids or subkeys, but I'm perfectly fine with the second. Yes, the first option seems sensible to me. Before starting

Bug#467001: signing-party: [gpg-key2ps] allow suppressing revoked subkeys

2008-02-22 Thread Luca Capello
Package: signing-party Version: 0.4.13-1 Severity: wishlist Hello, my GPG key 0x9DDB992B contains revoked subkeys, which are normally not shown. However, since gpg-key2ps invokes gpg with the '--with-colons' option, these subkeys are present in the output. One possibility would be having the