Hi,
On Fri, Apr 18, 2008 at 09:27:53AM +0200, Sebastian Harl wrote:
On Fri, Apr 18, 2008 at 08:22:07AM +0200, Florian Forster wrote:
Please give the attached patch a try and tell me if it worked or not.
I'm sure Sebastian or some howto can tell you how to do integrate that
into the package
Has anyone of you tested this patch so far? collectd 4.3.3 has just been
released which includes that patch. I'm going to close this bug again in
the next upload but I'd really like some positive feedback before doing
so.
TIA,
Sebastian
Yes, the patch works for me as I already said in
Hi Sebastian,
On Fri, Apr 18, 2008 at 09:27:53AM +0200, Sebastian Harl wrote:
On Fri, Apr 18, 2008 at 08:22:07AM +0200, Florian Forster wrote:
Please give the attached patch a try and tell me if it worked or not.
I'm sure Sebastian or some howto can tell you how to do integrate that
into the
Hi Alex,
while writing a reply and interpreting the log output you've provided, I
stumbled across the bug. The function which is responsible for
formatting the chip name does so depending on the type of the chip. The
returned status variable is only set in one out of three branches,
though :/ A
reopen 468143
found 468143 4.3.2-1
tags 468143 + patch pending fixed-upstream
thanks
Hi,
On Fri, Apr 18, 2008 at 08:22:07AM +0200, Florian Forster wrote:
while writing a reply and interpreting the log output you've provided, I
stumbled across the bug. The function which is responsible for
Hello,
unfortunately, the updated packages doesn't change anything. Still no sensor
data logged.
There are also multiple versions of libsensors used on my system, as the
fixes had to do with bugs in libsensors[34], this might be relevant
although sensors (libsensors4) and ksensors
Hi,
On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 10:05:35AM +0200, Alex wrote:
unfortunately, the updated packages doesn't change anything. Still no sensor
data logged.
:-/
There are also multiple versions of libsensors used on my system, as the
fixes had to do with bugs in libsensors[34], this might be
On Wednesday 16 April 2008, Sebastian Harl wrote:
Hrm, just a guess, but could you please try to install some 2.10.x
version of lm-sensors and try again? Please also try the sensors command
again. I guess you can get a 2.10.x package from
http://snapshot.debian.net/.
Tried version 2.10.5,
Hi Alex,
On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 11:13:10AM +0100, Alex Hermann wrote:
After the upgrade of collectd from 4.2.1-1 to 4.3.0-1, the sensors plugin
fails to collect data. No messages in syslog or anywhere else. The sensors
command-line utility still shows all values:
Could you please set the
On Wednesday 27 February 2008, Sebastian Harl wrote:
Could you please set the debug level to info and check if any messages
turn up in syslog? I currently have no idea what this might be caused by
but I will have a closer look at it soonish.
It already is. Collectd is completely silent, except
Package: collectd
Version: 4.3.0-1
Severity: normal
After the upgrade of collectd from 4.2.1-1 to 4.3.0-1, the sensors plugin
fails to collect data. No messages in syslog or anywhere else. The sensors
command-line utility still shows all values:
$ sensors
asb100-i2c-1-2d
Adapter: SMBus nForce2
11 matches
Mail list logo
