Bug#468328: HairyDairyMaid / Re: Bug#468328: urjtag status

2009-04-18 Thread Waschk,Kolja
Hi, we try to make UrJTAG as capable as HairyDairyMaid; today, as far as I know, there shouldn't be much of a difference regarding the supported flash chips and target systems. But as HairyDairyMaid is a bit more specialized in just programming flash chips, it might work a little better with

Bug#468328: urjtag status

2009-04-06 Thread Uwe Hermann
Hi, On Sun, Apr 05, 2009 at 02:04:16AM -0700, Matt Taggart wrote: Any update on the status of the urjtag ITP? I'll do another upload soonish, there was one already but it got rejected because I missed some stuff in debian/copyright. I have also been looking at the HairyDairyMaid jtag utility

Bug#468328: urjtag status

2009-04-05 Thread Matt Taggart
Any update on the status of the urjtag ITP? I have also been looking at the HairyDairyMaid jtag utility available from http://downloads.openwrt.org/utils/ It seems to support more chips than the old openwince-jtag does, but do you know if urjtag can do the same things? Either way it might be