also sprach Nelson A. de Oliveira <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008.03.16.1639 +]:
> So I am going to update it with priority=2 (that is lower than before,
> where it was 5).
> Any problems with this?
Please make sure that the fix to #470591 ends up in lenny and
doesn't stay only in experimental.
--
also sprach Nelson A. de Oliveira <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008.03.16.1739 +0100]:
> On Wed, Mar 12, 2008 at 1:40 PM, martin f krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > This worked. I now have xloadimage come up next. I suppose that
> > should be even behind imagemagick? Maybe imagemagick should choose
>
Hi!
On Wed, Mar 12, 2008 at 1:40 PM, martin f krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This worked. I now have xloadimage come up next. I suppose that
> should be even behind imagemagick? Maybe imagemagick should choose
> priority=2 and xloadimage priority=1?
So I am going to update it with priorit
clone 470591 -1
reassign -1 xloadimage
thanks
also sprach Nelson A. de Oliveira <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008.03.12.1527 +0100]:
> Is it possible to you save
> http://people.debian.org/~naoliv/misc/imagemagick/imagemagick.mime as
> /usr/lib/mime/packages/imagemagick, run "update-mime" and see if you
>
Hi Martin!
On Wed, Mar 12, 2008 at 3:41 AM, martin f krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Please make sure that display is used only if no better image viewer
> is installed. I don't know how to do that, sorry.
Is it possible to you save
http://people.debian.org/~naoliv/misc/imagemagick/imagemag
Package: imagemagick
Version: 7:6.3.7.9.dfsg1-2
Severity: normal
File: /usr/bin/display
imagemagick's display is the default for viewing images on my
machine, but given the other image viewers, display is at best
a default and otherwise doesn't meet up to many needs. Yet, it is
listed before e.g.
6 matches
Mail list logo
