On mar, 2008-03-25 at 20:35 +0100, Luca Capello wrote:
That makes sense. debianutils provides neither x-www-browser nor
x-terminal-emulator.
Do you mean that every package that installs an alternative for
x-www-browser or x-terminal-emulator should install a .desktop file?
Maybe we can
Hi there!
On Sat, 22 Mar 2008 20:23:28 +0100, Clint Adams wrote:
On Sat, Mar 22, 2008 at 08:19:02PM +0100, Eduard Bloch wrote:
And what about x-www-browser (Subject)?
That makes sense. debianutils provides neither x-www-browser nor
x-terminal-emulator.
Do you mean that every package that
On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 08:35:12PM +0100, Luca Capello wrote:
Do you mean that every package that installs an alternative for
x-www-browser or x-terminal-emulator should install a .desktop file?
Maybe we can have a new alternative x-www-browser.desktop and
x-terminal-emulator.desktop.
That
Package: debianutils
Severity: wishlist
Hello,
see subject and below. What do you think?
Regards,
Eduard.
- Forwarded message from Luca Capello [EMAIL PROTECTED] -
Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2008 19:43:22 +0100
From: Luca Capello [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: .desktop files for x-www-browser
On Sat, Mar 22, 2008 at 07:32:01PM +0100, Eduard Bloch wrote:
see subject and below. What do you think?
I think debianutils is the wrong place for .desktop files or icons.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
#include hallo.h
* Clint Adams [Sat, Mar 22 2008, 02:48:08PM]:
On Sat, Mar 22, 2008 at 07:32:01PM +0100, Eduard Bloch wrote:
see subject and below. What do you think?
I think debianutils is the wrong place for .desktop files or icons.
Why? They would accompany the pseudo-executables
On Sat, Mar 22, 2008 at 07:52:48PM +0100, Eduard Bloch wrote:
Why? They would accompany the pseudo-executables provided in your
package. What is a better place than in the package itself?
Is this for a window manager that would be calling sensible-browser
directly?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
#include hallo.h
* Clint Adams [Sat, Mar 22 2008, 03:03:41PM]:
On Sat, Mar 22, 2008 at 07:52:48PM +0100, Eduard Bloch wrote:
Why? They would accompany the pseudo-executables provided in your
package. What is a better place than in the package itself?
Is this for a window manager that would
#include hallo.h
* Clint Adams [Sat, Mar 22 2008, 03:15:34PM]:
On Sat, Mar 22, 2008 at 08:08:47PM +0100, Eduard Bloch wrote:
For some of them, yes. And maybe other uses.
Okay. No window manager should ever call sensible-browser directly.
That makes no sense.
And what about x-www-browser
On Sat, Mar 22, 2008 at 08:19:02PM +0100, Eduard Bloch wrote:
And what about x-www-browser (Subject)?
That makes sense. debianutils provides neither x-www-browser nor
x-terminal-emulator.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL
On Sat, Mar 22, 2008 at 08:08:47PM +0100, Eduard Bloch wrote:
For some of them, yes. And maybe other uses.
Okay. No window manager should ever call sensible-browser directly.
That makes no sense.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
11 matches
Mail list logo
