Bug#47467: [Pkg-shadow-devel] Bug#47467: #47467 to be closed by PAMification of chfn and chsh?

2005-10-17 Thread Christian Perrier
tags 47467 wontfix thanks (Alexander last comment did not make it yet to the mailing list...it seems that Alioth mailing lists are incredibly slow these days) Soo http://bugs.debian.org/46467 for the very last comment by Alexander. From this last comment, my conclusion is that, for a feature

Bug#47467: [Pkg-shadow-devel] Bug#47467: #47467 to be closed by PAMification of chfn and chsh?

2005-10-15 Thread Christian Perrier
I don't want to know about the details, I just want to know whether this should still be our problem about the proper PAMification of chsh and chfn. No, this is NSS/libc guys' problem in first place, then ours (with Tomasz). Well, now it's time to deal with this. From the above,

Bug#47467: [Pkg-shadow-devel] Bug#47467: #47467 to be closed by PAMification of chfn and chsh?

2005-10-14 Thread Christian Perrier
I don't want to know about the details, I just want to know whether this should still be our problem about the proper PAMification of chsh and chfn. No, this is NSS/libc guys' problem in first place, then ours (with Tomasz). Well, now it's time to deal with this. From the above,

Bug#47467: [Pkg-shadow-devel] Bug#47467: #47467 to be closed by PAMification of chfn and chsh?

2005-10-07 Thread Christian Perrier
Quoting Alexander Gattin ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): Hi! On Thu, Oct 06, 2005 at 07:57:25AM +0200, Christian Perrier wrote: In http://bugs.debian.org/47467, the bug submitter requests that chfn and chsh allow working on NIS accounts. As far as I understand, this should *now* be possible

Bug#47467: [Pkg-shadow-devel] Bug#47467: #47467 to be closed by PAMification of chfn and chsh?

2005-10-07 Thread Alexander Gattin
Hi! On Fri, Oct 07, 2005 at 07:26:02AM +0200, Christian Perrier wrote: Quoting Alexander Gattin ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): ... I can confirm that PAM auth works fine now, but as for changing anything on NIS server, it's IMHO impossible with current libc (I may be wrong) -- for this there are

Bug#47467: #47467 to be closed by PAMification of chfn and chsh?

2005-10-06 Thread Christian Perrier
Tomasz, In http://bugs.debian.org/47467, the bug submitter requests that chfn and chsh allow working on NIS accounts. As far as I understand, this should *now* be possible because these utilities are PAMified. Could you confirm (I know you're using a NIS setup, so this should be easy to test for

Bug#47467: #47467 to be closed by PAMification of chfn and chsh?

2005-10-06 Thread Tomasz Kłoczko
On Thu, 6 Oct 2005, Christian Perrier wrote: Tomasz, In http://bugs.debian.org/47467, the bug submitter requests that chfn and chsh allow working on NIS accounts. As far as I understand, this should *now* be possible because these utilities are PAMified. Could you confirm (I know you're

Bug#47467: #47467 to be closed by PAMification of chfn and chsh?

2005-10-06 Thread Christian Perrier
Quoting Tomasz Kłoczko ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): In form distributed in 4.0.12 this can't work because this two tools aren't use pam_start() co. : (it works for me only because I use pam_make for sync files and NIS .db; now after review pam_unix soutrce code I know it can be prapared directly

Bug#47467: [Pkg-shadow-devel] Bug#47467: #47467 to be closed by PAMification of chfn and chsh?

2005-10-06 Thread Alexander Gattin
Hi! On Thu, Oct 06, 2005 at 07:57:25AM +0200, Christian Perrier wrote: In http://bugs.debian.org/47467, the bug submitter requests that chfn and chsh allow working on NIS accounts. As far as I understand, this should *now* be possible because these utilities are PAMified. Could you confirm