tags 47467 wontfix
thanks
(Alexander last comment did not make it yet to the mailing list...it
seems that Alioth mailing lists are incredibly slow these days)
Soo http://bugs.debian.org/46467 for the very last comment by
Alexander.
>From this last comment, my conclusion is that, for a feature th
> > I don't want to know about the details, I just want to know whether
> > this should still be our problem about the proper PAMification of chsh
> > and chfn.
>
> No, this is NSS/libc guys' problem in first place, then
> ours (with Tomasz).
Well, now it's time to deal with this.
>From th
> > I don't want to know about the details, I just want to know whether
> > this should still be our problem about the proper PAMification of chsh
> > and chfn.
>
> No, this is NSS/libc guys' problem in first place, then
> ours (with Tomasz).
Well, now it's time to deal with this.
>From th
Hi!
On Fri, Oct 07, 2005 at 07:26:02AM +0200, Christian Perrier wrote:
> Quoting Alexander Gattin ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
...
> > I can confirm that PAM auth works fine now, but as for
> > changing anything on NIS server, it's IMHO impossible
> > with current libc (I may be wrong) -- for this there
>
Quoting Alexander Gattin ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> Hi!
>
> On Thu, Oct 06, 2005 at 07:57:25AM +0200, Christian Perrier wrote:
> > In http://bugs.debian.org/47467, the bug submitter requests that chfn
> > and chsh allow working on NIS accounts.
> >
> > As far as I understand, this should *now* be pos
Hi!
On Thu, Oct 06, 2005 at 07:57:25AM +0200, Christian Perrier wrote:
> In http://bugs.debian.org/47467, the bug submitter requests that chfn
> and chsh allow working on NIS accounts.
>
> As far as I understand, this should *now* be possible because these
> utilities are PAMified. Could you conf
6 matches
Mail list logo
