Greetings, and thanks for the feedback! WOuld you mind excerpting the
C routines corresponding to the two 'no' results below, compile with
-g and run under gdb to let me know where they fail? I am surprised
at the failure.
Specifically, what is wrong with
void gprof_cleanup() {};
int
Greetings, and thank you for the report! I think just uploaded -38
should fix all issues, modulo typos, etc.
Please let me know if this works for you.
Take care,
David Bremner [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I had to apply the patch from Peter de Wachter (#487435) to get gcl to build
on my box (I
Intially on debian kernel 2.6.25-7, configuration of gcl 2.6.7-38
failed (log on http://www.cs.unb.ca/~bremner/logs/2008/07/31/gcl.log
but I think there is nothing too surprising there) with the message
checking for ADDR_NO_RANDOMIZE constant... yes, 4
checking for
I had to apply the patch from Peter de Wachter (#487435) to get gcl to build
on my box (I guess it is a kernel 2.6.25 issue). With this patched version of
gcl 2.6.7-36.1, I get farther into the build, but it fails compiling
numerical/slatec/zexp.o
full build log is at
4 matches
Mail list logo
